From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oo1-f70.google.com (mail-oo1-f70.google.com [209.85.161.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC0CD12F585 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2026 12:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.70 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775477396; cv=none; b=B4c26Qq4OaN10Yj1LIWkB/OUpvMthROqj3nUGrWqKSRTrWIzkHYZmX+TOZlYcGvQ53zjWSYGxHnkVYOlYSdTJyrCWHRdFpANOM11jzFpVVecWCB/f52T4mwR4D8iSAi5IdD4LETFRY+zW5q6mG79zCOz2N4IvLwmPrY//mqapBA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775477396; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b/rgaYEmYBMAp1FeM5aEySHMHF6vnuOoDZC2vM5xmuA=; h=MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=PenMfrfmeCZwTZfnETjqAlunxuD7onylpcoR7I984pJX6eMUCr+PRxz0vt0yO6eksDm2yempVPO7Y+hKr2hIP/9OXeKXXRijpUK7pp0CzeacNTzjEA2jzp92KV42go4w5NI+0dSv+ZT0Elizn3Q6pbVZbTljPWALeHDbvvHywAo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.70 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=syzkaller.appspotmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com Received: by mail-oo1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-6861462170aso1248668eaf.0 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:09:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775477394; x=1776082194; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=L/nK8WYdhAt0nK4ei4CxJ/lRC+4Kvz9zrcASGtedDYc=; b=E0aja+PM16F62KlroWjSLR7/ri2ILs78mwHieSSRESaKPxas3j9mYSg511yUpyYYHv Gfj7VnoFRqAFJ7ziaCF80ksVBryFxuXkldJr7gwmmKCV7uLn2yX6b+6VxBIYnJNZZIiV AM6A+58F/65p7iYjPwgVQmRJIepWea0w9ko1SZtrSa8uLqttkjIu0UmLd92fV15ws0RZ Ue6sOZZ18fNMki1sIPPGIIBeW8qxrqvtWLtLa9Krule9WZpGExhE9mItw9hbc25HBqap z6xjy/iXQYjFo4JT/my4JQqPQDsEJw35d4H066l+QHNr0gT9Kle6CV6LYr+KzhHL4OfC Njvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxqbaLn/KLX8xVpXC5oWzA5QAPfsOlx+fD4LkQVs0zMYKFOa00S W3f6MjC4iPfJ7RE9gxn/05wcC24P0dH35vPNhL+MEupQNqNfaIy7h9QpPo+x4HReuj7V8CYYBzO hj4D9Czca3xv76LzAUsm/AXiwiqd0rnnqtG6KM+8DNdlto01+A+vJRl8TVKA= Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: syzbot@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:1845:b0:67c:f1d7:3d56 with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-6822005b026mr7938657eaf.47.1775477393908; Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:09:53 -0700 X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <69d3a291.050a0220.2dbe29.002f.GAE@google.com> Subject: [moderation/CI] Re: net: netrom: fix lock order inversion in nr_add_node, nr_del_node and nr_dec_obs From: syzbot ci To: syzkaller-upstream-moderation@googlegroups.com Cc: syzbot@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" syzbot ci has tested the following series [v1] net: netrom: fix lock order inversion in nr_add_node, nr_del_node and nr_dec_obs https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260406110643.82577-1-mashiro.chen@mailbox.org * [PATCH net] net: netrom: fix lock order inversion in nr_add_node, nr_del_node and nr_dec_obs and found the following issue: kernel build error Full report is available here: https://ci.syzbot.org/series/54fe750b-7b2a-4915-8b4d-6b7488a3c190 *** kernel build error tree: net URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git base: 1caa871bb0615e2b68aa11bb7b453eeac770ea1d arch: amd64 compiler: Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8 config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/0d6ae9c5-6e6a-4046-a3ab-25c17283d0fd/config net/netrom/nr_route.c:250:6: error: call to undeclared function 'nr_remove_neigh_locked'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] *** If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message: Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com. To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test` (should be on a separate line). The patch should be attached to the email. Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported. The email will later be sent to: [davem@davemloft.net edumazet@google.com horms@kernel.org kuba@kernel.org linux-hams@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org mashiro.chen@mailbox.org netdev@vger.kernel.org pabeni@redhat.com syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com] If the report looks fine to you, reply with: #syz upstream If the report is a false positive, reply with #syz invalid