From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E97333442 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2026 10:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772966928; cv=none; b=sfab+qn4Miz7vjPXprllEjy3lzG3J3n0j3CjWnxFg9JAaNCW62br9JjQGBwG/2RyH9UiD6vXMSF36EWhXnE2mqqVk/9QIvtZX6ybc+cuxOxoRe4ihU63VY0KPjhUbo5bzbSoXYhn/dtJGTd6aUtdO4suyhTr4i0jUUyx1X3Dc50= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772966928; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DGifS48hX4FURk/YYa+c2nvTrbRL/oGcZNvshK9owgg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pIS+3x5xRC5T3tBYgDl76sIsogRHbd3BSkdqSZL0+zq9PsLcRmzm9X7dBvqrTTKDBog+lS1PYWXsLj3DQku61c6WRT9Rg91nNVdD6I7dFNktwyiRD8y+7yEEOpY6gmEvJp3nvn8107XxzurggLOn839qDATGZZQ58GYVVsZBp2w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=BZHcb3kD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="BZHcb3kD" Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 992FA6057E; Sun, 8 Mar 2026 11:48:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1772966925; bh=JmZglYM6jWpym4G9BPVdVKM6u7Vq+QppIEnqz42nzi0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BZHcb3kD65Yt/q0xHJWIm410dJwwcGJ8Y89nz1SSTzfM+JyNdaLYEiwh00KY96JcE jZTaHKFHJZsVC27yQ9mSJli1NBLT2pyA2kKMHDCm/SVaB/3tovjOEfOM8XDYjnajaG T9nF/MRVsMVxjPzrvEsxYEv73LbpidTisHZ+S20IccmliYXFEWfqh626kwxSDJQzgI GuVzeu4AV5Y9O0YhbKo/NYFcOquNSYHw7ItWshq3vWi1L0uyxhRJZIHg5/+jyusKRX 5d+CclUoJGcFCXlev6fw0LzCzF5VKiz1Kne/GbvS4orWXEzv9eoZtds/MnUtyiZlZ2 TY6QQ9WmpQnhQ== Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2026 11:48:43 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: syzbot ci Cc: fw@strlen.de, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot@lists.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [syzbot ci] Re: netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: allocate same array size on updates Message-ID: References: <20260306123649.2878676-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <69ac7562.050a0220.13f275.005a.GAE@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: syzbot@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <69ac7562.050a0220.13f275.005a.GAE@google.com> On Sat, Mar 07, 2026 at 10:58:42AM -0800, syzbot ci wrote: > syzbot ci has tested the following series > > [v1] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: allocate same array size on updates > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260306123649.2878676-1-pablo@netfilter.org > * [PATCH nf] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: allocate same array size on updates > > and found the following issue: > general protection fault in nft_array_may_resize > > Full report is available here: > https://ci.syzbot.org/series/63a7af7e-7e81-40b3-ac44-4a537af34cdfi For the record, this is fixed in v2: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20260307001124.2897063-1-pablo@netfilter.org/