From: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
To: syzbot <syzbot@kernel.org>
Cc: syzkaller-upstream-moderation@googlegroups.com, syzbot@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] 9p/trans_fd: enforce non-blocking I/O with IOCB_NOWAIT
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:45:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ams5Zg_d25P06k0J@nr200> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b6e50bb-fee0-4489-a753-00087e6944ae@mail.kernel.org>
On cze 29, 2026 18:08, syzbot wrote:
> The 9p filesystem's file descriptor transport uses workqueues to handle
> asynchronous reading and writing. When a connection is established, it sets
> the O_NONBLOCK flag on the provided file descriptors to prevent workers
> from hanging on I/O. However, because the file descriptors are shared with
> userspace, a malicious or buggy userspace program can clear the O_NONBLOCK
> flag concurrently using fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, ...).
>
> If userspace clears the O_NONBLOCK flag, the read worker (p9_read_work) can
> block indefinitely in kernel_read() when reading from an empty pipe. When
> the connection is subsequently destroyed, p9_conn_destroy() calls
> cancel_work_sync(&m->rq), which hangs forever waiting for the blocked read
> worker, eventually triggering the khungtaskd watchdog:
>
> INFO: task blocked for more than 143 seconds.
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __schedule+0x17e7/0x5630 kernel/sched/core.c:7234
> schedule+0x164/0x2b0 kernel/sched/core.c:7326
> schedule_timeout+0xc0/0x2c0 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:75
> wait_for_completion+0x2ca/0x5e0 kernel/sched/completion.c:153
> __flush_work+0xa63/0xca0 kernel/workqueue.c:4374
> __cancel_work_sync+0xbe/0x110 kernel/workqueue.c:4494
> p9_conn_destroy net/9p/trans_fd.c:805 [inline]
> p9_fd_close+0x23c/0x3f0 net/9p/trans_fd.c:840
> p9_client_create+0x8a6/0xc60 net/9p/client.c:939
> v9fs_session_init+0x46/0xd40 fs/9p/v9fs.c:471
> v9fs_get_tree+0xbd/0xac0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:97
> vfs_get_tree+0x92/0x2a0 fs/super.c:1694
> do_new_mount+0x319/0xdc0 fs/namespace.c:3841
> __se_sys_mount+0x31d/0x420 fs/namespace.c:4367
> do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x560 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> </TASK>
>
> To fix this, do not rely on file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK to ensure
> non-blocking I/O. Instead, replace kernel_read() and kernel_write() with
> vfs_iocb_iter_read() and vfs_iocb_iter_write(), passing a kiocb with the
> IOCB_NOWAIT flag set. This guarantees non-blocking behavior regardless of
> the f_flags state, completely eliminating the race condition with
> userspace.
>
> Fixes: ef575281b21e ("9p/trans_fd: always use O_NONBLOCK read/write")
> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview best-expensive syzbot
> Reported-by: syzbot+ed53e35a1e9dde289579@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ed53e35a1e9dde289579
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=372eb0ab-345a-4053-96b2-027ab6aa8d21
> To: "Dominique Martinet" <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
> To: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@kernel.org>
> To: "Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@ionkov.net>
> To: <v9fs@lists.linux.dev>
> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: "Christian Schoenebeck" <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
> index eb685b52a..2b3a07b98 100644
> --- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
> +++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/inet.h>
> #include <linux/file.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/fs_context.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> @@ -217,7 +218,9 @@ static int p9_fd_read(struct p9_client *client, void *v, int len)
> {
> int ret;
> struct p9_trans_fd *ts = NULL;
> - loff_t pos;
> + struct kiocb kiocb;
> + struct iov_iter iter;
> + struct kvec iov = { .iov_base = v, .iov_len = len };
I see that __kernel_read() (called from kernel_read()) clamps the iov_len:
.iov_len = min_t(size_t, count, MAX_RW_COUNT)
Maybe it is worth doing the same in this patch?
> if (client && client->status != Disconnected)
> ts = client->trans;
> @@ -225,11 +228,16 @@ static int p9_fd_read(struct p9_client *client, void *v, int len)
> if (!ts)
> return -EREMOTEIO;
>
> - if (!(ts->rd->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
> - p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "blocking read ...\n");
> + init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, ts->rd);
> + kiocb.ki_pos = ts->rd->f_pos;
> + kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_NOWAIT;
> +
> + iov_iter_kvec(&iter, ITER_DEST, &iov, 1, len);
> +
> + ret = vfs_iocb_iter_read(ts->rd, &kiocb, &iter);
If the kernel_read() is replaced with vfs_iocb_iter_read() then accounting functions will not be
called like it is with __kernel_read():
ret = file->f_op->read_iter(&kiocb, &iter);
if (ret > 0) {
...
add_rchar(current, ret);
}
inc_syscr(current);
Maybe it would be better to duplicated what kernel_read()/__kernel_read() does but with IOCB_NOWAIT
set, even if that brings a bit of code duplication?
I've done some tests (num of IOPS, mean latency for READ and WRITE) with fio to benchmark this fix
and I see 5% to 10% degradation in performance with this patch.
> + if (ret > 0)
> + ts->rd->f_pos = kiocb.ki_pos;
>
> - pos = ts->rd->f_pos;
> - ret = kernel_read(ts->rd, v, len, &pos);
> if (ret <= 0 && ret != -ERESTARTSYS && ret != -EAGAIN)
> client->status = Disconnected;
> return ret;
> @@ -385,6 +393,9 @@ static int p9_fd_write(struct p9_client *client, void *v, int len)
> {
> ssize_t ret;
> struct p9_trans_fd *ts = NULL;
> + struct kiocb kiocb;
> + struct iov_iter iter;
> + struct kvec iov = { .iov_base = v, .iov_len = len };
ditto
> if (client && client->status != Disconnected)
> ts = client->trans;
> @@ -392,10 +403,16 @@ static int p9_fd_write(struct p9_client *client, void *v, int len)
> if (!ts)
> return -EREMOTEIO;
>
> - if (!(ts->wr->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
> - p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "blocking write ...\n");
> + init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, ts->wr);
> + kiocb.ki_pos = ts->wr->f_pos;
> + kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_NOWAIT;
> +
> + iov_iter_kvec(&iter, ITER_SOURCE, &iov, 1, len);
> +
> + ret = vfs_iocb_iter_write(ts->wr, &kiocb, &iter);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + ts->wr->f_pos = kiocb.ki_pos;
ditto
>
> - ret = kernel_write(ts->wr, v, len, &ts->wr->f_pos);
> if (ret <= 0 && ret != -ERESTARTSYS && ret != -EAGAIN)
> client->status = Disconnected;
> return ret;
> @@ -728,21 +745,11 @@ static int p9_fd_open(struct p9_client *client, int rfd, int wfd)
> goto out_free_ts;
> if (!(ts->rd->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
> goto out_put_rd;
> - /* Prevent workers from hanging on IO when fd is a pipe.
> - * It's technically possible for userspace or concurrent mounts to
> - * modify this flag concurrently, which will likely result in a
> - * broken filesystem. However, just having bad flags here should
> - * not crash the kernel or cause any other sort of bug, so mark this
> - * particular data race as intentional so that tooling (like KCSAN)
> - * can allow it and detect further problems.
> - */
> - data_race(ts->rd->f_flags |= O_NONBLOCK);
> ts->wr = fget(wfd);
> if (!ts->wr)
> goto out_put_rd;
> if (!(ts->wr->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> goto out_put_wr;
> - data_race(ts->wr->f_flags |= O_NONBLOCK);
>
> client->trans = ts;
> client->status = Connected;
> @@ -784,8 +791,6 @@ static int p9_socket_open(struct p9_client *client, struct socket *csocket)
> client->trans = p;
> client->status = Connected;
>
> - p->rd->f_flags |= O_NONBLOCK;
> -
> p9_conn_create(client);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> base-commit: dc59e4fea9d83f03bad6bddf3fa2e52491777482
--
Slawomir Stepien
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 18:08 [PATCH RFC] 9p/trans_fd: enforce non-blocking I/O with IOCB_NOWAIT syzbot
2026-07-30 11:45 ` Slawomir Stepien [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ams5Zg_d25P06k0J@nr200 \
--to=sst@poczta.fm \
--cc=syzbot@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-upstream-moderation@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox