From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: syzbot <syzbot@kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com>,
Nobuo Iwata <nobuo.iwata@fujixerox.co.jp>
Cc: i@zenithal.me, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot@lists.linux.dev, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbip: fix use-after-free in event_handler()
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 11:31:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b47d2b37-0aba-46cc-afaf-cf824d99524e@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee9bc932-2fbf-4e8f-90e2-6cf604be9ff1@mail.kernel.org>
On 8/3/26 09:05, syzbot wrote:
> From: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>
>
> The event_handler function in drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_event.c is a
> workqueue item responsible for processing events for a struct usbip_device.
> During device teardown, usbip_stop_eh() is called to wait for the event
> handler to finish processing. However, usbip_stop_eh() uses
> wait_event_interruptible() and ignores its return value. If the process
> unbinding the driver receives a signal, wait_event_interruptible() returns
> immediately, causing the teardown process to falsely assume the event
> handler has finished.
Does this mean unbinding didn't happen?
The teardown process then proceeds to free the
> usbip_device memory. Meanwhile, the event_handler workqueue is still
> running and attempts to access the freed usbip_device, resulting in a KASAN
> slab-use-after-free crash.
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mutex_lock_common
> kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0
> kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
> Read of size 1 at addr ffff8881145245b0 by task kworker/u8:5/6177
>
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> lock_acquire+0x84/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5842
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
> mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
> event_handler+0x1e3/0x4a0 drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_event.c:73
> process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3322 [inline]
> process_scheduled_works+0xa8e/0x14e0 kernel/workqueue.c:3405
> worker_thread+0xa47/0xfb0 kernel/workqueue.c:3486
> kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436
> ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
> </TASK>
>
> To fix this, change wait_event_interruptible() to wait_event() in
> usbip_stop_eh(). This ensures that the teardown process strictly waits for
> the event handler to finish its execution and drop all references to the
> usbip_device before the memory is freed, preventing the use-after-free.
> This change is safe from deadlocks because usbip_stop_eh() is never called
> with locks held that the event_handler would need to acquire.
Correct - usbip_stop_eh() is called without lock hold after updating
the shutdown_busid status to true. However I am curious what happens
to the unbinding? Should usbip_stop_eh() check the return value of
wait_event_interruptible() and handle the error instead?
thanks,
-- Shuah
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 15:05 [PATCH] usbip: fix use-after-free in event_handler() syzbot
2026-08-04 17:31 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b47d2b37-0aba-46cc-afaf-cf824d99524e@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=i@zenithal.me \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nobuo.iwata@fujixerox.co.jp \
--cc=nogikh@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox