target-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
To: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] target: fix truncated PR-in ReadKeys response
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:02:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619140216.23077c60@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180605100025.12112-1-ddiss@suse.de>

cc'ing the SCSI list, as it doesn't look like anything is making it
through target-devel nowadays...
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10448059/

Cheers, David

On Tue,  5 Jun 2018 12:00:25 +0200, David Disseldorp wrote:

> SPC5r17 states that the contents of the ADDITIONAL LENGTH field are not
> altered based on the allocation length, so always calculate and pack the
> full key list length even if the list itself is truncated.
> 
> According to Maged:
>   Yes it fixes the "Storage Spaces Persistent Reservation" test in the
>   Windows 2016 Server Failover Cluster validation suites when having
>   many connections that result in more than 8 registrations. I tested
>   your patch on 4.17 with iblock.
> 
> This behaviour can be tested using the libiscsi PrinReadKeys.Truncate
> test.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Maged Mokhtar <mmokhtar@petasan.org>
> ---
>  drivers/target/target_core_pr.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Changes since v1:
> * CC stable
> * mention Maged's Windows PR test fix comment in commit message
> * add Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
> index 01ac306131c1..2e865fdaa362 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
> @@ -3727,11 +3727,16 @@ core_scsi3_pri_read_keys(struct se_cmd *cmd)
>  		 * Check for overflow of 8byte PRI READ_KEYS payload and
>  		 * next reservation key list descriptor.
>  		 */
> -		if ((add_len + 8) > (cmd->data_length - 8))
> -			break;
> -
> -		put_unaligned_be64(pr_reg->pr_res_key, &buf[off]);
> -		off += 8;
> +		if ((off + 8) <= cmd->data_length) {
> +			put_unaligned_be64(pr_reg->pr_res_key, &buf[off]);
> +			off += 8;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		 * SPC5r17: 6.16.2 READ KEYS service action
> +		 * The ADDITIONAL LENGTH field indicates the number of bytes in
> +		 * the Reservation key list. The contents of the ADDITIONAL
> +		 * LENGTH field are not altered based on the allocation length
> +		 */
>  		add_len += 8;
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&dev->t10_pr.registration_lock);


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-19 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-05 10:00 [PATCH v2] target: fix truncated PR-in ReadKeys response David Disseldorp
2018-06-19 12:02 ` David Disseldorp [this message]
2018-06-19 15:58   ` [PATCH v3] " David Disseldorp
2018-06-20  1:37     ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-06-19 14:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180619140216.23077c60@suse.de \
    --to=ddiss@suse.de \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).