From: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov@yadro.com>
To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Cc: Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<target-devel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux@yadro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] target: core: check RTPI uniquity for enabled TPG
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:37:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221004163703.GD10901@yadro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f730538-6738-86b9-fefe-da09ad9e0a47@oracle.com>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 07:02:12PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> On 9/6/22 10:45 AM, Dmitry Bogdanov wrote:
> > Garantee uniquity of RTPI only for enabled target port groups.
> > Allow any RPTI for disabled tpg until it is enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov@yadro.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c | 29 +++++++++++++-
> > drivers/target/target_core_internal.h | 2 +
> > drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c | 40 +++++++++++++-------
> > 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c b/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c
> > index a34b5db4eec5..fc1b8f54fb54 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c
> > @@ -857,6 +857,7 @@ static ssize_t target_fabric_tpg_base_enable_store(struct config_item *item,
> > size_t count)
> > {
> > struct se_portal_group *se_tpg = to_tpg(item);
> > + struct se_portal_group *tpg;
> > int ret;
> > bool op;
> >
> > @@ -867,11 +868,37 @@ static ssize_t target_fabric_tpg_base_enable_store(struct config_item *item,
> > if (se_tpg->enabled == op)
> > return count;
> >
> > + spin_lock(&g_tpg_lock);
> > +
> > + if (op) {
> > + tpg = core_get_tpg_by_rtpi(se_tpg->tpg_rtpi);
> > + if (tpg) {
> > + spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock);
> > +
> > + pr_err("TARGET_CORE[%s]->TPG[%u] - RTPI %#x conflicts with TARGET_CORE[%s]->TPG[%u]\n",
> > + se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo->fabric_name,
> > + se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo->tpg_get_tag(tpg),
> > + se_tpg->tpg_rtpi,
> > + tpg->se_tpg_tfo->fabric_name,
> > + tpg->se_tpg_tfo->tpg_get_tag(tpg));
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + se_tpg->enabled |= 0x10; /* transient state */
>
> Just use a mutex and hold it the entire time if you can and
> drop this. Or add a proper enum/define for the states and make a real
> API since this is exported to userspace, and it's going to be difficult
> to explain to users that state.
Yes, it looks wierd.
After rewriting to xarray I decided (according to SAM-5) to not allow
to change RTPI on the enabled TPG. And that part will be dropped.
4.6.5.2 Relative Port Identifier attribute
The relative port identifier for a SCSI port shall not change once
assigned unless reconfiguration of the SCSI target device occurs.
>
> > + spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock);
> > +
> > ret = se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo->fabric_enable_tpg(se_tpg, op);
> > - if (ret)
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&g_tpg_lock);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + se_tpg->enabled &= ~0x10; /* clear transient state */
> > + spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock);
> > return ret;
> > + }
> >
> > se_tpg->enabled = op;
> > + spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock);
> >
> > return count;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_internal.h b/drivers/target/target_core_internal.h
> > index d662cdc9a04c..d4ace697edb0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_internal.h
> > @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ int core_tmr_lun_reset(struct se_device *, struct se_tmr_req *,
> > struct list_head *, struct se_cmd *);
> >
> > /* target_core_tpg.c */
> > +extern struct spinlock g_tpg_lock;
> > extern struct se_device *g_lun0_dev;
> > extern struct configfs_attribute *core_tpg_attrib_attrs[];
> >
> > @@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ void core_tpg_remove_lun(struct se_portal_group *, struct se_lun *);
> > struct se_node_acl *core_tpg_add_initiator_node_acl(struct se_portal_group *tpg,
> > const char *initiatorname);
> > void core_tpg_del_initiator_node_acl(struct se_node_acl *acl);
> > +struct se_portal_group *core_get_tpg_by_rtpi(u16 rtpi);
> >
> > /* target_core_transport.c */
> > extern struct kmem_cache *se_tmr_req_cache;
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
> > index 85c9473a38fd..ef2adbe628e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
> > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ extern struct se_device *g_lun0_dev;
> > static u16 g_tpg_count;
> > static u16 g_tpg_rtpi_counter = 1;
> > static LIST_HEAD(g_tpg_list);
> > -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(g_tpg_lock);
> > +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(g_tpg_lock);
> >
> > /* __core_tpg_get_initiator_node_acl():
> > *
> > @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int core_tpg_register_rtpi(struct se_portal_group *se_tpg)
> > * Make sure RELATIVE TARGET PORT IDENTIFIER is unique
> > * for 16-bit wrap..
> > */
> > - if (se_tpg->tpg_rtpi == tpg->tpg_rtpi)
> > + if (tpg->enabled && se_tpg->tpg_rtpi == tpg->tpg_rtpi)
> > goto again;
> > }
> > list_add(&se_tpg->tpg_list, &g_tpg_list);
> > @@ -738,12 +738,26 @@ static ssize_t core_tpg_rtpi_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
> > return sprintf(page, "%#x\n", se_tpg->tpg_rtpi);
> > }
> >
> > +struct se_portal_group *
> > +core_get_tpg_by_rtpi(u16 rtpi)
> > +{
> > + struct se_portal_group *tpg;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&g_tpg_lock);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(tpg, &g_tpg_list, tpg_list) {
> > + if (tpg->enabled && rtpi == tpg->tpg_rtpi)
> > + return tpg;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static ssize_t core_tpg_rtpi_store(struct config_item *item,
> > const char *page, size_t count)
> > {
> > struct se_portal_group *se_tpg = attrib_to_tpg(item);
> > struct se_portal_group *tpg;
> > - bool rtpi_changed = false;
> > u16 val;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -753,11 +767,14 @@ static ssize_t core_tpg_rtpi_store(struct config_item *item,
> > if (val == 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - /* RTPI shouldn't conflict with values of existing ports */
> > + if (se_tpg->tpg_rtpi == val)
> > + return count;
>
> This test above and the chunk at the end looks like it should have been
> in patch 6.
>
This patch will be completely rewritten.
> > +
> > spin_lock(&g_tpg_lock);
> >
> > - list_for_each_entry(tpg, &g_tpg_list, tpg_list) {
> > - if (se_tpg != tpg && val == tpg->tpg_rtpi) {
> > + if (se_tpg->enabled) {
> > + tpg = core_get_tpg_by_rtpi(val);
> > + if (tpg) {
> > spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock);
> > pr_err("TARGET_CORE[%s]->TPG[%u] - RTPI %#x conflicts with TARGET_CORE[%s]->TPG[%u]\n",
> > se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo->fabric_name,
> > @@ -769,17 +786,12 @@ static ssize_t core_tpg_rtpi_store(struct config_item *item,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (se_tpg->tpg_rtpi != val) {
> > - se_tpg->tpg_rtpi = val;
> > - rtpi_changed = true;
> > - }
> > + se_tpg->tpg_rtpi = val;
> > spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock);
> >
> > - if (rtpi_changed)
> > - core_tpg_ua(se_tpg, 0x3f, ASCQ_3FH_INQUIRY_DATA_HAS_CHANGED);
> > - ret = count;
> > + core_tpg_ua(se_tpg, 0x3f, ASCQ_3FH_INQUIRY_DATA_HAS_CHANGED);
> >
> > - return ret;
> > + return count;
> > }
> >
> > CONFIGFS_ATTR(core_tpg_, rtpi);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-04 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 15:45 [PATCH 0/7] scsi: target: make RTPI an TPG identifier Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-06 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/7] scsi: target: core: Add cleanup sequence in core_tpg_register() Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-06 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/7] scsi: target: core: Add RTPI field to target port Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-29 22:26 ` Mike Christie
2022-09-29 23:57 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-04 16:11 ` Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-06 15:45 ` [PATCH 3/7] scsi: target: core: Use RTPI from " Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-06 15:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] scsi: target: core: Drop device-based RTPI Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-06 15:45 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi: target: core: Add common port attributes Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-06 15:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] scsi: target: core: Add RTPI attribute for target port Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-30 0:03 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-04 16:12 ` Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-06 15:45 ` [PATCH 7/7] target: core: check RTPI uniquity for enabled TPG Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-09-30 0:02 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-01 16:19 ` michael.christie
2022-10-04 16:41 ` Dmitry Bogdanov
2022-10-04 16:37 ` Dmitry Bogdanov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221004163703.GD10901@yadro.com \
--to=d.bogdanov@yadro.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@yadro.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).