From: "Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu>
To: "Dmitry Bogdanov" <d.bogdanov@yadro.com>,
"Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@redhat.com>
Cc: <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target: generate correct string identifiers for PR OUT transport IDs
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 14:16:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DAZ0DFSD9PQS.1UG92BS9ZTTOZ@bsdbackstore.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250627174022.GA19805@yadro.com>
On Fri Jun 27, 2025 at 7:40 PM CEST, Dmitry Bogdanov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
>>
>> Fix target_parse_pr_out_transport_id() to
>> return a dynamically allocated string representing the
>> transport ID in a standardized, human-readable format
>> (e.g., naa.xxxxxxxx...) for various SCSI protocol types
>> (SAS, FCP, SRP, SBP).
>
> There is no a single standard how to represent TransportId. There are
> several standards for the same port address. But TransportId itself is
> the single standard to represent different port names in binary format.
> So, the most correct solution would be have TransportId for ACLs and
> to match them.
That's right. I will avoid using the word "standardized", which is not
correct in this context.
>
>>
>> Previously, the function returned a pointer to the raw binary buffer.
>> The caller would then compared it to a human-readable string,
>> which obviously always failed.
>>
>> Now, the function constructs a string using kasprintf()
>> based on the protocol's offset and format:
>>
>> * SAS, FCP, SBP: 64-bit identifier
>> * SRP: 128-bit identifier
>> * iSCSI: duplicates the iqn string to match the new allocation behavior
>
> The caller compares it with a specifically prepared string buffer by
> fabric module in its own way. And they are not corresponded any
> standard and, that especially important, to your code.
> Mostly that string contains only hex-representation without any prefixes.
> You may grep target_setup_session to check which transport
> generates what a string.
Thanks for the hint. I was misled by rtslib which enforces those
prefixes. I will fix it and submit a V2.
Maurizio
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-29 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 14:52 [PATCH] target: generate correct string identifiers for PR OUT transport IDs Maurizio Lombardi
2025-06-27 17:40 ` Dmitry Bogdanov
2025-06-29 12:16 ` Maurizio Lombardi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DAZ0DFSD9PQS.1UG92BS9ZTTOZ@bsdbackstore.eu \
--to=mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu \
--cc=d.bogdanov@yadro.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).