From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yuanhe Shu" <xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target: Verify the iSCSI ISID is NUL-terminated
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 09:19:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-184760@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026044632.1738901-1-xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] scsi: target: 8-byte OOB read in __core_scsi3_do_alloc_registration()
--
commit 9e538bce0beb997676ced65cf68b1194c6fc594a
Author: Yuanhe Shu <xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>
scsi: target: Verify the iSCSI ISID is NUL-terminated
This patch verifies that the iSCSI ISID in a FORMAT CODE 01b TransportID
contains a NUL terminator within the descriptor before returning a pointer
into the PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT parameter list buffer. This aims to prevent
string operations in the registration code from reading past the end of the
mapped buffer.
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_lib.c b/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_lib.c
> index 2853b95b2c597..e15f5118b2099 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_lib.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,17 @@ static bool iscsi_parse_pr_out_transport_id(
> pr_err("Missing ISID in iSCSI Initiator port TransportID\n");
> return false;
> }
> + /*
> + * The conversion loop below only scans the ISID without
> + * ever terminating it, but the registration code reads it
> + * as a C string. With no NUL inside the TransportID,
> + * the reads run past the descriptor, and past the
> + * mapped buffer when the descriptor ends the buffer.
> + */
> + if (!memchr(p, '\0', buf + tid_len - p)) {
> + pr_err("Missing NUL terminator for ISID in iSCSI Initiator port TransportID\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> *port_nexus_ptr = p;
[Severity: High]
Does checking only for a NUL byte within buf + tid_len - p still leave an
out-of-bounds read when the remaining length is between 1 and 7 bytes?
Both the SPEC_I_PT path and the REGISTER AND MOVE path pass *port_nexus_ptr
(as iport_ptr / isid) into __core_scsi3_do_alloc_registration():
core_scsi3_decode_spec_i_port()
-> __core_scsi3_alloc_registration(..., iport_ptr, ...)
-> __core_scsi3_do_alloc_registration(..., isid, ...)
core_scsi3_emulate_pro_register_and_move()
-> core_scsi3_alloc_registration(..., iport_ptr, ...)
-> __core_scsi3_alloc_registration(..., isid, ...)
-> __core_scsi3_do_alloc_registration(..., isid, ...)
In drivers/target/target_core_pr.c:__core_scsi3_do_alloc_registration(),
before copying isid with snprintf(), the code unconditionally reads 8 bytes
from isid:
if (isid != NULL) {
pr_reg->pr_reg_bin_isid = get_unaligned_be64(isid);
snprintf(pr_reg->pr_reg_isid, PR_REG_ISID_LEN, "%s", isid);
pr_reg->isid_present_at_reg = 1;
}
If a FORMAT CODE 01b TransportID at the end of the parameter list buffer
has 1 <= buf + tid_len - p < 8 bytes after the ",i,0x" separator and
includes a '\0' byte, memchr(p, '\0', buf + tid_len - p) succeeds, but
get_unaligned_be64(isid) still reads up to 7 bytes past buf + tid_len (and
into the trailing vmalloc guard page on multi-page mappings).
Should get_unaligned_be64() read from the zero-initialized
pr_reg->pr_reg_isid buffer after snprintf(), or should
iscsi_parse_pr_out_transport_id() require the full ISID length?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261026044632.1738901-1-xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 4:46 [PATCH] scsi: target: Verify the iSCSI ISID is NUL-terminated Yuanhe Shu
2026-10-26 9:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-26 12:48 ` Yuanhe Shu
2026-10-26 12:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Yuanhe Shu
2026-10-31 1:20 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-184760@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox