From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections From: James Bottomley In-Reply-To: <20070822143813.a78ed233.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <1187796179.3410.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070822212202.GE17546@redhat.com> <20070822213358.GA3672@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <20070822143813.a78ed233.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:44:17 -0500 Message-Id: <1187819057.3410.116.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: public TAB mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Dave Jones , Tech Board Discuss , linux-kernel On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 14:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote: > > > * Dave Jones (davej@redhat.com) wrote: > > > I have a reservation about voting for any of the above. > > > Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort > > > of "why you should vote for me" type statement. Does such a thing > > > exist for this process ? > > > > Last year each nominee made a statement as you describe before > > the votes were cast (during the voting session). > > and if they won't be present? The Chair reads their statement. James