From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:55:04 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections Message-ID: <20070824025504.GT9163@parisc-linux.org> References: <1187796179.3410.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070822224400.GA17255@srcf.ucam.org> <20070823002618.GO9163@parisc-linux.org> <20070823003748.GR30556@waste.org> <20070823004209.GP9163@parisc-linux.org> <20070823011953.GS30556@waste.org> <1187832907.3410.141.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070824012730.GA1243@hexapodia.org> <625fc13d0708231934q5b369b4fh1a5c83def0e56a0d@mail.gmail.com> <20070824025254.GH21720@waste.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070824025254.GH21720@waste.org> List-Id: public TAB mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Matt Mackall Cc: Matthew Garrett , Tech Board Discuss , linux-kernel , James Bottomley , Andy Isaacson , Josh Boyer , ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community. As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not like it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in SPI. And somebody else takes care of the bureaucracy for you. -- "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."