From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:18:54 -0400 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections Message-ID: <20070829021854.GA29615@thunk.org> References: <625fc13d0708231934q5b369b4fh1a5c83def0e56a0d@mail.gmail.com> <20070824025254.GH21720@waste.org> <20070824025504.GT9163@parisc-linux.org> <20070824032228.GJ21720@waste.org> <20070824155735.GA14978@kroah.com> <20070824234840.GC19595@kroah.com> <20070825010329.6f5bc47c@the-village.bc.nu> <46D2A113.2030403@sgi.com> <20070827050432.06f9590f@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <46D2BFC8.7000904@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46D2BFC8.7000904@sgi.com> List-Id: public TAB mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Matthew Garrett , Tech Board Discuss , linux-kernel , Andy Isaacson , Josh Boyer , ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:12:56PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Yes, as well as 12 committee members, of which 5 didn't even comply with > their own git commit requirement last time I checked. Note that the git commit metric is not a "requirement", but a way of seeding the list of people to be considered. The current selection process is that we *start* with that list, and then accept nominations from anyone for anyone (including self-nominations) that should be considered that weren't automatically included by the git selection criteria. - Ted