From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:30:52 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Message-ID: <20200711133052.GA6407@amd>
References: <159419296487.2464622.863943877093636532.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <159419296487.2464622.863943877093636532.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH v2] CodingStyle: Inclusive
	Terminology
List-Id: Public TAB discussion <tech-board-discuss.lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/tech-board-discuss>, 
 <mailto:tech-board-discuss-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/tech-board-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tech-board-discuss-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/tech-board-discuss>, 
 <mailto:tech-board-discuss-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Chris Mason <clm@fb.clm>, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org


--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed 2020-07-08 00:23:59, Dan Williams wrote:
> Linux maintains a coding-style and its own idiomatic set of terminology.
> Update the style guidelines to recommend replacements for the terms
> master/slave and blacklist/whitelist.
>=20

> +replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: 'denylist/allowlist' or
> +'blocklist/passlist'.

I don't see what is "non inclusive" about blacklist and whitelist...

Plus, please grep kernel for actual usages. blocklist/denylist is
_not_ suitable replacement for kernel use of blacklist.

									Pavel
--=20
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAl8JvwwACgkQMOfwapXb+vKaeACdEuEPBbuseLU7rRRWibY5FYQ8
/BEAnRKhc9QvpKTqxo3q27Du59cpsTcJ
=siog
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--