From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org B2475403A8 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org B896A4038C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1697468809; x=1697555209; bh=S/ Y5lXNea7faIU2f6VRUoxJ6yibWKqPMrWfROLfFYHU=; b=Prpmda3pnS53SL8bEH +SrFEcAtpMJJ21uu9pTAXjdcCo5/RyvIeRA7oSXGOOrkgOzmSB2hcWCVRmZXq6ZK wxmufM0Lb5PUgD2DVp6zbrrtJ3OlRbkn5ItY71nlB7NxlduPWiVUGbmmgnoS5HFz x6LCB+EIpBV9EhEY9xzLNafgjsk2gDCOLMmhTNt2Q/9uajV5LAb0bt58a0ZIwk/r 5V3pHpOipqYMp2XK72QtgGZfJhhPSxci0v3Ce49c5OWS9RphWTKkh/cx2bKhAe7Q lOoesyHXAoUGjV7sksw0E7XOlrkh9Uu6JKQGZOg3yN1ZTVma+hwq+sgpHZLABxNs f4TQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1697468809; x=1697555209; bh=S/Y5lXNea7faI U2f6VRUoxJ6yibWKqPMrWfROLfFYHU=; b=M/f2LHJoUHohtl6QroH45Jss+z5mF SNa+WLGm+7wgeSVV+Uh2NQJadkhfe+T+n4cEnbUC8Tn8eo+eqOn0kMTvXoUs/+L7 aKSwO/7N2fp7rgTQra/PPva1rTIyWWtcDnfEWmzikuriecHCZW4a1nwvKzlD36Kb MNOV+ANTU7wAQIXwc6rCDfv8fQ1Jz1/rRioF1NXVkJzSjerz6cobqcQM/38HOnf8 GiHRiSC0Yn/6JeCpCsSV/OAZx4qPPnvhyAoViKWx2zYLq429ras09VJM5rV0Lges JX59HuMyukFdX1V0LdVoa9UK0uV+ZJvkMA5GR1gr9OA7PS2bVrj0W9ijQ== Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:03:10 +0200 From: Greg KH Message-ID: <2023101626-equal-blazer-6b4b@gregkh> References: <42c40a4b-78d5-4878-9eff-31bcfc221d35@linuxfoundation.org> <20231016103933.16f53df9@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231016103933.16f53df9@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Linux Kernel Code of Conduct Committee: September 30, 2023 List-Id: Public TAB discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Steven Rostedt Cc: "conduct@kernel.org" , "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:39:33AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:54:16 -0600 > Shuah Khan wrote: > > > Dear TAB members, > > > > Please review this Code of Conduct Report for April 1, 2023 through > > September 30, 2023 and give us feedback. > > > > Sorry for the late reply, just been way behind in work lately. > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Linux Kernel Code of Conduct Committee: September 30, 2023 > > > > In the period of April 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023, the Code of > > Conduct Committee received the following reports: > > > > Unacceptable behavior or comments in email: 4 > > > > The result of the investigation: > > - Education and coaching clarifying the Code of Conduct conduct > > related to normal review and patch acceptance process: 3 > > - Clarification on the Code of Conduct conduct related to > > maintainer rights and responsibility to reject code: 1 > > > > The reports were about the discussion during the patch review and > > decisions made in rejecting code and these actions are not viewed > > as violations of the Code of Conduct. > > > > Please see the excerpt from the Responsibilities section in the > > code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst document: > > > > "setting expertise expectations, making decisions and rejecting unsuitable > > contributions are not viewed as a violation of the Code of Conduct." > > Sounds to me that people are trying to use the CoC as a way to get code > accepted? Yes, people are trying to use the CoC as a way to push back on patch rejections, it's not anything new, unfortunately :( > Well, there's only 4 reports in a month. I hope that's not too > much of a hassle. 4 reports in 6 months, it's not much of a hassle so far. thanks, greg k-h