From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED604A5C2A for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.137 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789146015; cv=fail; b=AmemY5g1dfbkeTD+AsbotWA8V3kXYHxsq2zTKoKyM48yzS9eKn1RMRxIPeNacDV3rhM85JB+G26e7MTsxGpLBVJvQnvyjByPpMEA9IUTNyfO4V5Yl+1XrS1e6eE2pIG1oEEgOqT+aDHrpYUBY4xgt0h1kk4rucUcggpGGGdt084= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789146015; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ONGEYhYzlTgk54pjNVvdMvEG2dX1VbJ00CLgZLx/A4M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PoFYlVZ4f5oTY5r+1fPoVVntuorGxLyrHxKBl3QQpbkw19EDgF3q9YwXnkLZr+bOvf+edLzXpX1WYsQNdqXWABav+3JtGNvf/wJi2Tc//xh6KYJ0l3ZOwr+r1u4URgId/ZIEZHYyq/CmmC1FvfWPmODN9sr/ZXs3OzImdqx8VlY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=P/Ntou6i; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.137 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="P/Ntou6i" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AED407C5 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:00:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.351 X-Spam-Level: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrH2I0apWsD7 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:00:04 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.3.0 smtp4.osuosl.org C6584406EF Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip="2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42" ARC-Seal: i=1; d=osuosl.org; s=arc; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1789146004; b=cLhIFC2XmrPpOgo886CLOyatOzaVKFe12msaKt5oLkznlYarxIYOoNJHUmzoZIQs4RhW g6ixSqKSnDkEU2wdiatOLTEmPmEIjKUPSMac54MvC6gF6n/ZAlmI3DsfypUqN6X2nOgAM Qx5hczWRyRBpIdQK/nDvNRBMwnGObTuvw7MQ1B90cwso/6ZujdNfkx+9dxQXWOwJHWDE1 TTqXvo6YEQpggEBkNGRFr7hbEpwScafePCTuClicpA0x42qNMklCAMchkapWPLDmoYCUE 9yWCCZrj0WX+DAj57pj5nnwSoyYTRgl1CdtJxQgdaiketh1ca0sky4KlEz+vKpivfWw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=osuosl.org; s=arc; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1789146004; h=X-Greylist:Received-SPF:DKIM-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:From:To: Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; bh=P/EV+22TaGlwTOOLfKMe0PsZLPtZtiT5PPy6+3MQtMo=; b=Xm2aCJG7tEG7nYyCNMviEqOgbtbtotyup4r7ZERK8GF8AZkzJYJzwscpVcRMGekx8uVA Xw7qjUrwoZWiughedKrvMJEMmgW3pzVDqG2+W2uon/7HhmdxHx+JYmQyUwHcnojXU8cy9 NIDQWDKRuii9Fq1/TGHIEoLjUagyI8TEFcmYeiwe7n2f34ZqIrx58K212VxWwO2WlUVQm lswNPdcer2VTNa/VY9gsMhYUb+Y4grK4FXnnR2NHlCDzdqvtKognJAIS+bj1QLZSAc40K fmu9na8G53LgJND4XT5ushzB8s+3Rw7aAkf9F+brXXfUyihlN01CY7U3HMFWHXrbFVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass header.from=lwn.net; dkim=pass header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20201203 header.b="P/Ntou6i"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip="2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42" X-Greylist: delayed 598 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at util1.osuosl.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:00:03 UTC Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20201203 header.b=P/Ntou6i Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42; helo=ms.lwn.net; envelope-from=corbet@lwn.net; receiver= Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6584406EF for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:00:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net EE56C408B4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1789145404; bh=P/EV+22TaGlwTOOLfKMe0PsZLPtZtiT5PPy6+3MQtMo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=P/Ntou6ieQhT/jseBxZ8AWOCuhdGYa6KUv4UUq9dGMM5wwsKfPqLiQ6yaocp8ZNI7 KnI+lBXTMXuLLgydjRIxlVu2jZuMtr5jKX4f3HJ4GfUW0LbVkoMuXC8o8vyugHh8Tb SvdAp4OuYRqfK2LL6fKPfan3O25HZAOXyVYKIoOwvA73MP91c9LGXFpQmIFY96sbYM qg1TczHyDWC4R68pZnGzVe4Y+NpcQdFEgqEGmzeQ+sQE30vkYyTqYZ4hStgqZ6uFhS bwgxT2orW9ZZexaiZJL7G3t1d+15vMm1PSIoaNZ57vY9k07uylzy3YP5WfJ82UsTBC i3Ksb7WrdrbsA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:814::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE56C408B4; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:50:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Dave Hansen , Theodore Tso Cc: James Bottomley , Steven Rostedt , Monika Masciangelo , "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "contact@linuxplumbersconf.org" Subject: Re: [lpc-contact] Memorial for Dan Williams In-Reply-To: <1f9f5bb8-1806-4301-b25a-5abee23ac0c3@intel.com> References: <20260910144152.38a97e53@gandalf.local.home> <20260911084435.3b05ccd3@gandalf.local.home> <77a723fd27e3a3cbba461217ad233bca0ef39716.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1f9f5bb8-1806-4301-b25a-5abee23ac0c3@intel.com> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 10:50:03 -0600 Message-ID: <87ld97hgw4.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tech-board-discuss@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Dave Hansen writes: > On 9/11/26 08:48, Theodore Tso wrote: > ... >> If not, there will always be some people who might be uncomfortable if >> there is active A/V; even if we don't record it, someone on the remote >> end could. That seems relatively unlikely to me, but it's more about >> what other people might feel/perceive/fear. Could it still be >> worthwhile? >> >> One compromise might be that we don't broadcast the BBB link, but we >> only make it available to people who explicitly ask ahead of time. >> >> Dave, what do you think? > > Doing a BBB session, but keeping the link mostly private sounds like a > good compromise to me. We'd basically only share the link with people we > trust. You can, of course, set a room so that you have to approve everybody who enters. That means somebody has to be paying attention, though. jon