From: "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
users@linux.kernel.org, tools@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] b4 v0.4.0 available with new features
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 14:17:58 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200504171758.GY26002@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJ+0Py_XtTojshKPV+o8Y1-Z=pGYJFODDTRVuroLpsJCw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:04 PM Konstantin Ryabitsev
> <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all:
> >
> > I am happy to release b4 version 0.4.0 that contains a set of
> > improvements and new features. To upgrade from pypi, run:
>
> Thanks Konstantin! A couple of requests below.
>
> > pip install --upgrade --user b4
> >
> > Or you can clone the repository directly:
> > git clone https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/b4/b4.git -b stable-0.4.y b4
> >
> > You can run ./b4.sh from the repository or set an alias/symlink to that
> > wrapper.
> >
> > # Improvements
> >
> > - When a series is missing patches, b4 is now able to backfill them from
> > other mailing lists tracked on lore.kernel.org. This feature will be
> > improved when public-inbox is able to collect a thread from across all
> > sources.
> > - If both patch and metadata are identical between rerolls (v1 -> v2),
> > b4 will automatically carry over trailers from v1 to v2. This is handy
> > if there is an sob on [PATCH v2 7/15] from a maintainer that is
> > missing from an identical [PATCH v3 7/15]. In my observation, this
> > happens very rarely, though.
>
> This is pretty common actually. At least common enough that I do a
> check for this and have a semi-automated reply for it.
>
> I worry that automatically fixing it silently will create yet another
> case of tribal knowledge of maintainer practices/requirements for
> submitters. Maintainer A using b4 doesn't care if tags are added, but
> Maintainer B does care and gets grumpy. We need the tooling to promote
> that submitters should add these tags as that is what works in either
> case. It would be useful if b4 provided just the check as a separate
> command/option for integrating into maintainers tools or maybe
> submitter tools like checkpatch.pl.
It would be helpful if b4 had a submitter focused command that would
sync the tags from the mailing list with the current series in git (or
whatever)
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 17:04 b4 v0.4.0 available with new features Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-04-24 23:35 ` [tools] " Martin K. Petersen
2020-04-27 18:40 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-04-28 2:12 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-04-28 15:16 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-04-29 3:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-04-28 16:03 ` [kernel.org users] " Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-04 17:09 ` [kernel.org users] " Rob Herring
2020-05-04 17:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-05-04 20:09 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-05-04 23:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-04 20:03 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-05-04 22:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-04 23:04 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-06 19:23 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-07 20:20 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-05-12 19:07 ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 22:24 ` Rob Herring
2020-07-27 14:52 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200504171758.GY26002@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tools@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=users@linux.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).