From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DAFF7E; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFC932008C0; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:49:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:49:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cerno.tech; h=cc :cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1666255772; x=1666342172; bh=xXd9v9sHbQ EMJNQ8C5U4djoypVMeq8b0prrw/HC14mQ=; b=B+f+JngIsYBJQhBF8POupWVp8q R8AB+U20EnK9SVcTroAsJnDuzyz7T/gDSlSNMjk5WkrSvpOKebk2bv2Rv4AXNbdr +qacVbyYEPsGBLm9bLOwdLuFaw+jEJ5QbFercbOLOtVqaR3Rx0FkD9zIfQUpH4lh XJgwVf3yMZtBAciVTwP/kHN+8sX5rii1pRRkMQCni9uewcUxTJhRdtkJ2Cmcs4zO Z8VPFYhfHSmSjhx7KG5TYp/eNsTbEU1t+ECbCPMAkZk92pygu8i2H7Y1PrlaoK8I +u/3JUxlzL7sy22WJnHdFAPoPmsIsRC+V4uS65gxb7wSY7m9/SdS96y3zJKQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1666255772; x=1666342172; bh=xXd9v9sHbQEMJNQ8C5U4djoypVMe q8b0prrw/HC14mQ=; b=KN4BEncOebMfZKOB2/z0Bu1nkkb5+MixW1mTYkAUgp7Y mHrraZxc0yxe3xsqrO6jkVuQTNaL1mhFdGSfy5Nq6uRHxLI+yCYMd7sx6CSKiQ9u F+J8AqPJHlRPDOhawcQjrOhIC3tShNRczfn5s+0HQHBpVZhxDV9cbal5OC+4AH44 j6Sc+SK7dpTjdUYrTRK9LNT3Cjg7PJeuZkAxLZBIM2gn+XEUQQJCoY9nQmQLhxCe zSF8g1GZy/xdugs/djj5BMRVD7wO2ocGL7QoIgioohPN91oN03LhAha5NVQ/1HX+ O/KkKhgrSN58WVyjYk/JaJNwMwdQCi8GsHZsoS2BSw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeeliedgtdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrgihi mhgvucftihhprghrugcuoehmrgigihhmvgestggvrhhnohdrthgvtghhqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeelffevieehfeeltefhkeeufefhgeelkeevkeevheelgfeikeffieegfefg heffieenucffohhmrghinhepuhgsuhhnthhurdgtohhmpdhgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmrgigihhm vgestggvrhhnohdrthgvtghh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i8771445c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:49:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 10:49:30 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: users@linux.kernel.org, tools@linux.kernel.org Subject: Re: b4 bugs / future improvements Message-ID: <20221020084930.vpu552rag6gdvmvm@houat> References: <20221018153620.tyuedbldi2ofbe2x@houat> <20221018201804.na5x7lohm4yszg5h@nitro.local> <20221019080140.zc42aqi7gwjpvczs@houat> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ye6ojrjmp2wcx44i" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221019080140.zc42aqi7gwjpvczs@houat> --ye6ojrjmp2wcx44i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:01:40AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 04:18:04PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > > There's a bunch of things I have noticed in the recent weeks: > > >=20 > > > - It looks like 87e0e464959c breaks msmtp which doesn't recognize the > > > -f option, and will just error out > >=20 > > There's got to be something else going on, since -f is required for sen= dmail > > compatibility. The msmtp manpage specifically mentions that is supports= it: > > https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/man1/msmtp.1.html > >=20 > > (see under "options specific to sendmail mode") >=20 > It might be the auto argument that confuses it then? I'll check. So, here's the behaviour I'm seeing: $ printf "From: \nTo: \nSubject: Test= \n\nTest Test." | msmtp -i -f auto maxime@cerno.tech msmtp: recipient address maxime@cerno.tech not accepted by the server msmtp: server message: 504 5.5.2 : Sender address rejected: need full= y-qualified address msmtp: could not send mail (account default from /home/max/.config/msmtp/co= nfig) If I drop the -f auto, it works: $ printf "From: \nTo: \nSubject: Test= \n\nTest Test." | msmtp -i maxime@cerno.tech $ echo $? 0 It seems to be related to https://github.com/marlam/msmtp-mirror/issues/51 except I don't have set_from_header in my config. I've tried to use allow_from_override and force it to off, and it didn't help. Maxime --ye6ojrjmp2wcx44i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCY1ELmgAKCRDj7w1vZxhR xS4UAQCOa6JkoQxjxoFbp45JBFVJdzKs6Jxjk+aric7wT3azfgEAhdXzei9r1Mlf SAiK1edDaXqChhbledGSYrfDzHhEtAA= =7oM5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ye6ojrjmp2wcx44i--