From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
tools@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ASoC: rt5677: Refactor GPIO and use device_get_match_data()
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 15:18:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230712-smudge-overthrow-46457c@meerkat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a6e591d-6e07-4b9f-88e7-443bdc0508d2@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 07:59:24PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > But I think the complaint was about the merge commits being cut off:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git/commit/?id=5a043fd5c74c66897ad113e5ee34e9361e3f4c11
>
> Oh, I see. The commit in the mail looked like it might be off and it
> was in reply to the applied mail so I thought that was what was being
> referenced.
>
> > When I try "b4 shazam -M", the merge commit looks different to me, so I want
> > to understand how the merge commit is generated in your workflow.
>
> That's generated by my scripts based on the .cover that b4 writes out
> and some sed at the point where a merge is done. There's a bunch of CI
> happens between applying the patches and me actually merging them so I
> don't use b4 for that bit. It's just picking the subject line out with
> sed so there's no way it's going to handle multi-line subjects.
Will it help if b4 optionally writes out a foo.merge file in addition to
foo.cover in the same format as with "b4 shazam"?
-K
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-12 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230630172155.83754-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
[not found] ` <168916242630.46574.7633971537485557226.b4-ty@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <ZK6xI8l7Vdp35yJG@smile.fi.intel.com>
[not found] ` <d5cac1ef-1d44-4ab7-a933-b381108b1eaa@sirena.org.uk>
[not found] ` <ZK7HUTyKB6hoaBtV@smile.fi.intel.com>
2023-07-12 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ASoC: rt5677: Refactor GPIO and use device_get_match_data() Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-07-12 18:35 ` Mark Brown
2023-07-12 18:47 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-07-12 18:59 ` Mark Brown
2023-07-12 19:18 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev [this message]
2023-07-12 20:31 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230712-smudge-overthrow-46457c@meerkat \
--to=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=tools@linux.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox