From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D93022A7E5 for ; Fri, 2 May 2025 08:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746173925; cv=none; b=ZBtb6C1bHYjMAVyFT5XdCDxOAaPw/39xq8MbSAwxYYZTESwWGbZNcYnJOEnogOh1cHfDcQ+dIEXd1t7/EYCDs+QTi+pTTetfMXL8fXAcvlTE8B0JYoHnaN6ypDEGJASHcsR9bSr8INRiNsdFN8XdrgVn6E5Rdb8MMn6/aQAmLwk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746173925; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xYssf4LOgq0VNhC5INmCIVgWeSTMotc+cQY5inXoXj8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JMesyu831NkBVrHL3rrR2WTfjhskYf6zhJSQ+gJxkOvehGxZq/7vvU5Jg41XXzR+IHGY5aI8lABeW2frfNp11KiMJPlNADu0JHcA5ARYtDZ11vL5g1Dqhnt2XfZ42ubsRaJHEB67l8YFzj3JKiAqP8nqqXl0rPwihQa4xKpdFtg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=L9LHyXNO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="L9LHyXNO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id 8570FC4CEEE; Fri, 2 May 2025 08:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5ABBC4CEE9; Fri, 2 May 2025 08:18:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746173924; bh=xYssf4LOgq0VNhC5INmCIVgWeSTMotc+cQY5inXoXj8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=L9LHyXNOECKuTFUxrufswLzQgOSOKGErjXGQMIzBh86pMxxedZ79yhoMwPIbivJ3m GEIFckpCwZ75yjXdsdah17LktffqNG/IN7E8CATQrkw1OimmAxw8iDdTIhJfWOyCvq 9+9FVC0z74DWL5IKkGPDEmm37eoJ60cYPsGJie+GsvptuNLjPgc65N2O7HVqTfg75+ OJd28eNSOYsZUFSP1mh4Ux6qwKLj9KNrblsSs+ya9YLL2oZ/qvP/VgqVbZaqYHUhup G+POtO9RcH09XNJsqWpiLsC0nWN/+Iop+4/pii8fKFg7ptOHIMBCWYpcDh0s+aH0Nq WUVN2nEVCZXeA== Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 09:18:41 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: tools@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ty: Allow users to specify whether thank-yous are sent to themselves Message-ID: <20250502081841.GE3865826@google.com> References: <20250501091502.3663038-1-lee@kernel.org> <20250501-cooperative-enthusiastic-squirrel-7dfc3c@lemur> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250501-cooperative-enthusiastic-squirrel-7dfc3c@lemur> On Thu, 01 May 2025, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > The motivation behind this change was that thanks-yous weren't showing > > up in my inbox. This is a problem because I use the presence of these > > mails to indicate that particular sets or individual patches have been > > applied or not. > > > > Provide command line option '--send-to-self' to override the default > > behaviour. If this is not specified, there are no functional changes. > > Can we call it --me-too, to match the --not-me-too option for b4 prep? Thanks for your review. Yes, of course. I'll respin next week. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]