From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: users@kernel.org, tools@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [b4] initial "b4 dig" to supplant Link: trailers
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:47:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251015-lively-sassy-lizard-e34b98@lemur> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aO7FayHzTEKVsWAt@laps>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 05:49:31PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> 1. If the provided commit actually has a Link: trailer, we should just use
> that(?).
We do, but we now do it better in the latest master.
> 2. Some maintainers re-send patches they've accepted. An example:
>
> $ ~/b4/b4.sh dig -c 54b91e54b113d4f15ab023a44f508251db6e22e7 Digging into
> commit 54b91e54b113d4f15ab023a44f508251db6e22e7
> Attempting to match by exact patch-id...
> Trying to find matching series by patch-id 340e7baae92a71dd5e62a4e8a52245348ff3a0a1 (myers)
> Found matching series by patch-id
> Will consider promising messages: 2
> ---
> [for-linus][PATCH v2 2/2] tracing: Stop fortify-string from warning in tracing_mark_raw_write()
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251011194257.341582199@kernel.org
>
> Which doesn't end up pointing to the actual submission. I'm not really sure
> whats the "correct" way of addressing this...
There isn't a good way to deal with this. In this particular case there's a
Link: trailer in the commit, so we can filter by that to find the right patch,
but failing that it's a pattern that will always "win" because it's newer and
from the same author.
> 3. Date filtering seems to be broken:
Rather, I found that using rt: is not always effective for some reason, so I
switched to using d:, which seems to be more reliable.
-K
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-10 20:47 [b4] initial "b4 dig" to supplant Link: trailers Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-10-11 12:39 ` Greg KH
2025-10-13 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-11 20:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-11 22:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-10-11 23:38 ` Sasha Levin
2025-10-11 23:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-10-12 0:39 ` Sasha Levin
2025-10-12 23:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-13 17:12 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-13 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-10-14 21:17 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-10-14 21:49 ` Sasha Levin
2025-10-15 13:47 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev [this message]
2025-10-14 22:13 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-15 13:44 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-10-15 13:52 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-15 16:40 ` Rob Herring
2025-10-15 2:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-10-15 13:43 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-10-15 17:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251015-lively-sassy-lizard-e34b98@lemur \
--to=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=tools@kernel.org \
--cc=users@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).