From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3B0E30FF04 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766143601; cv=none; b=h3/m8Xwsbf+y5E34fFusQOLDhl2IdUMvAZJt9sFw0z2STHc4o72+NQwiBrZ7HPVqn3M+BuvA3NPgOLjoVuAdOGAjjgzX92hknyhicpXkFOu8HZqD+/+/T5TDzZnI4onWHM9TGE3mpbAJmq2yYQyh1XYWSgoiHxOPw4dxPBNHOAo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766143601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=emCDmsE3rurjfQPDmhdnWGfjUOSO12N/ORlhonGNo20=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dCQ1/VoE09rA2mIoJTwFElrQqZu/u9C57fXRn/N7Ds0kZz9tkWVmdBCw0E3KUV9uhfcjustPhRRwWpEfsFsX7B/j2RHRVMEkhgCHa/2T4QNDjNkVACETaz78BSZEF5tysZp+ILZDf3+qzkBZS9r1j0JyPO2BoV9+wBwDVQe6Pfc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Uhboe+vq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Uhboe+vq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id 735EAC4CEF1; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44492C116C6; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:26:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1766143601; bh=emCDmsE3rurjfQPDmhdnWGfjUOSO12N/ORlhonGNo20=; h=Date:From:List-Id:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Uhboe+vqiisKPjFv6ErbJkTs47pFlFEKevXBD2LojW0gPHaQO1TTcsMF41eHsFJSs 7dkcSHjrzC0C4kxI7AafLr95Q2H9QXR/iR2630QyiRnaHmEmaNzVLW4FdLMQ+uq3Jn OVoAmYuSsLD5JsdqkmPwRyxRgoqCT4NCeKdhpgpj0A1kwg60A/XkmaExRKBqXDnyXy 6JRP3uuRrQZhEGCz2HlA5dJci8wWDrPr+JIYx/z82R7urzc4ymXBIkWWWwgNc28vpW IK2+GIV1/WFBMAV4vuDH/D+f+svrmo1k/Jf1YlIU0C93UeoxgVgiKGtIEfI3eCy/ja R4uC+abCEUFVA== Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:26:34 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org, Konstantin Ryabitsev , tools@kernel.org Cc: Troy Mitchell , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, dlan@gentoo.org, elder@riscstar.com, andi.shyti@kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] fix the SpacemiT P1 Kconfig and resend the K1 I2C ILCR patch. Message-ID: <20251219112634.GJ9275@google.com> References: <20251118-p1-kconfig-fix-v3-0-8839c5ac5db3@linux.spacemit.com> <176613181654.3684357.18070317581817603415.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <176613181654.3684357.18070317581817603415.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Hi Konstantin, > This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes) > by Alexandre Belloni : > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 14:08:04 +0800 you wrote: > > Since P1 Kconfig directly selects K1_I2C, after the I2C ILCR patch was > > merged, the driver would fail [1] when COMMON_CLK was not selected. > > > > This series fixes the P1 Kconfig and resends the I2C ILCR patch(This > > patch has reverted by maintainer [2]). > > > > Now, P1 Kconfig patch has been merged[3], so I2C ILCR patch can be > > merged as well. > > > > [...] > > Here is the summary with links: > - [v3,1/4] i2c: spacemit: configure ILCR for accurate SCL frequency > (no matching commit) > - [v3,2/4] rtc: spacemit: MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 as dependencies > https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/16bd954c9336 > - [v3,3/4] regulator: spacemit: MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 as dependencies > (no matching commit) > - [v3,4/4] mfd: simple-mfd-i2c: add default value > (no matching commit) I was just about to send another snot-o-gram about people picking up patches without the correct Acks, but I just realised this is the same Patchwork issue we spoke about a couple of weeks ago. This formatting is very confusing, since at first blush it looks as though the whole patch-set was applied. Please can we only list patches that were merged? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]