From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58125391E40 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773147579; cv=none; b=Nwh7SNNJ49us8J2ITfcMR9APYiwfLG2ecn/rms3NThAtB9NmhFhqCUk6P9deTJ2BvT2PEVM1k8IsEgGAMZA4AxmLJ7oUI5Cs4u6lUW7aHNc5JhqbLQSI5Eyt7XNVUwWga0ZKF3EnOASBXTGtbcNXh9mFhHnfQ6oitooVC/UFrSY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773147579; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+AtiBMaSkeNs+xvw3qA4SivxnTKsHWjM9+KTuHCSgrs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PqWKlLqshmTjBw04eYA8N9Juh01MGi7bnxSKUEiVJkc0+LyZHbaGa67Fx4wKALSMNSa8M4FqHmrWuKibbKeZBxp2XhFrR7PjhvodZ34mszxFcRSWJ7pGAlckQEqVmsK41Fh5322WkDzAqlyk/jpA24/xsBj36wEvaqheOEMMvMg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=PkozhtkD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="PkozhtkD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id 0EF0AC2BC9E; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0736C19423; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:59:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1773147578; bh=+AtiBMaSkeNs+xvw3qA4SivxnTKsHWjM9+KTuHCSgrs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PkozhtkD9Mtt4Z/NhUbjhEuneKY+Ynef/BfMd235EBgg0/AKFRWST681LISOejw+G xuc0h9wR71LO8m4J8rvHwj/oMW0R2Au15ys0wIk3HB2BraviRaKt8iqoVVA9LdSmBL bqaYj4flSsRWNZ4UQMb39LTFkBRLrmQK0FMb0S40= Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:59:37 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Mark Brown Cc: tools@kernel.org Subject: Re: b4 review handling when base can't be guessed Message-ID: <20260310-strong-copper-stoat-5de7ee@lemur> References: <092a612b-4fa1-4fa7-a872-b3564fcb3749@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <092a612b-4fa1-4fa7-a872-b3564fcb3749@sirena.org.uk> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 12:49:41PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > In b4 review tui if the base of a series can't be guessed then when > trying to review you get stopped on a screen saying "Attestation check" > and in the dialog "Base: not specified (a/b blobs match HEAD)". It > would be really helpful to have a flow for specifying what HEAD to try > here other than quitting and doing a git checkout (which I hope works?). It shouldn't stop you there -- you can still "y" confirm and try to apply it to a best-guessed tree. However, let me play with it and see if we can also present an override for which base we use in that screen. bugspray tag b4/review -- KR