From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E003D8120 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773336123; cv=none; b=Aqrd5Yck9l3BBxE8KVKe4mC2oOMVB5tUAFcaCDSjep1nQ0xzjVtqS04Y/8CzGj1PFr9p8TNUJPYCisafS/HaBojVPe7d0/uofYtkfgeh7cJeBOf0tJjp8vDZaEgCbhc4Eyhv7iHtIzZpl0XvIHA+E8dgWHJbeZh9SSAFH/LDRhM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773336123; c=relaxed/simple; bh=42u2ONt3dYDPxvB5goYgbrWIsaVeiTbmOAk1xkr7CRo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kWypN3w9L8RRS7GczBtwIZUxwt3RtZkx25PAabcBjeXRcbPCh0Hb2uX7T7SwpUEfn2EJEwt2RadH2e4i7I3QMEvp+gmrZGayJghQZPUDmEi9eAfh8AOcJ0a6r0h3teC1NimzQaSq3FmzYaNgHHFiVumIlNIZOHPZSMUeF9aKknk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=UFLLRpRn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="UFLLRpRn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id E239EC2BCAF; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E5B9C2BC87; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:21:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.kernel.org 2E5B9C2BC87 Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E30EC415A9; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 245CD6001B; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id DAC19103686BD; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 18:21:56 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1773336117; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=rV1YfdDnbJwg54zJOSLCccRXET5qy7ybdmzrYnAx+XU=; b=UFLLRpRnGroszrE5I2U1acKn/sXkJnA3X6DWJ0dXZ4ZHooNKE+DQR2QJdeDqcSH/HhavQW C6YnXcOdUT0+KLbeXHdbiwrSw+S7Z99wBMhiKckcGtSiFDXodDouahYzbsKglr0U23bdNl E+o7C2Mnt4UfVnv5N5yBBkPEofHD6iRZfaTMlyoZU714mpTxkfQvQ+fftmOKnrMQcu1R2g l9LhkjF8Mqc0tSHLo+4Sgwa7vpYQwJiGChnIaPbmiiEom8C3jYDcnCg7aAqcDvq+xS97uF XXmPesHan3c++ZI/wI9yuImFik+g/4aRDn03hCf2h6uPOvQ2eycCTeW1IB0DQg== Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 18:21:56 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: Mark Brown , users@kernel.org, tools@kernel.org Subject: Re: b4 review available in master Message-ID: <20260312172156f5cb4041@mail.local> References: <20260227-imported-aromatic-guppy-ad3dca@lemur> <20260302-juicy-spoonbill-of-jest-6fc659@lemur> <20260303-true-glaring-raven-e78bf2@lemur> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260303-true-glaring-raven-e78bf2@lemur> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On 03/03/2026 13:21:21-0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > > I'll push back on this a little simply because there's a lot that is keyed off > > > the number of patches in the series. If we cherry-pick before we even review, > > > this makes a lot of other functionality fragile. However, there is code now to > > > mark patches as "skip" (with x) -- this should let you completely ignore them. > > > When we "take" a series with ignored patches we will automatically default to > > > the cherry-pick strategy and pre-unselect the ignored patches. Would that come > > > kinda close to what you want? > > > > Possibly? I'd need to try it. Some of these serieses are quite large > > so even finding the relevant mails can be annoying. > > Let me know if that's not sufficient. We can also give a way to hide skipped > patches so they aren't even in the picture. This worked for me but thank-you still tried to thank for all the commits of the series. Also: I used cherry-pick, would Linear work? -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com