From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B3C25B2F4 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790254418; cv=none; b=NV64QLY9INZqejldaAsXlUDuoU7Y15lBonRwf2iynTlGhXtzz81QZmIe8csy3VCrB9J62ul6tiG39KDYI9fZaVElCl+tM83K+kKMhPL+s0McIxgfarmmis5qsVuzfLKgko1/mGqa4TwMk1bV+1r58wNUhll+IrIyJPml1acpqTk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790254418; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sdi2QAHLTs2w7j6+bhnkRXMuZpqtEim8ZBNFwKoA3qw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=InSRY1ZhNUtAc0TN0hAaFG2iikSFKyBmx+ZdzGz6jTPvZZMB5dG0jyszhBOe3Hf93joYCjC7rpx4UB6utUAvCFVpypzRQxmyYsuhVeZXkBQWWBwXi1C+aozhc0ilTD8Fc6UMQp2WV+TfICahzmjhFU81XTBrwIdtnlr04lOccq0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fU5XANsx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fU5XANsx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id 1F3CF1F000FF; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AA961F00893; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:53:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790254415; bh=P6YHYJbyRi8EleAGD0wttGhUXSoUEKQC0tXQkGvstKE=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To; b=fU5XANsx+X9R9J74gqH68eVJOq9M3rIC0MpZ1Xye7xsEoMbSTFKlgs+snNuCMKr07 V747J9sTJdDUg33iSKiARvGbk0yDALBqLsZFxffVkefmQMlbAqZ4l8K4HrKeTlKjyS RMZ2rrQKWsoxne0w/Dk2akIOmpC6fAVkqPC2I/hYezUKZSwlnG3kA3Z0mEQmgS6vHM 8pUQVGzGqvbNgkV7gKHmYTKEGAHukIasbf4H3Fne7ss3gI8TGt9pNZBzbbOheUINTv uKZcccdtWViu5ibVCPnk7sw46NQ1/kJbdvSXXK2gzhS9cDQzUxata1qY26VoqMrWUx nnP4gL4xHA/Ew== Message-ID: <4d64b396-3d06-4356-b5f6-1599e9e3f4f0@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 14:53:31 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: review-tui: Handle different Patchwork current statuses From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: "Kernel.org Tools" Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley References: <643cb7a7-d817-441b-913f-7f78e7710e5c@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=krzk@kernel.org; keydata= xsFNBFVDQq4BEAC6KeLOfFsAvFMBsrCrJ2bCalhPv5+KQF2PS2+iwZI8BpRZoV+Bd5kWvN79 cFgcqTTuNHjAvxtUG8pQgGTHAObYs6xeYJtjUH0ZX6ndJ33FJYf5V3yXqqjcZ30FgHzJCFUu JMp7PSyMPzpUXfU12yfcRYVEMQrmplNZssmYhiTeVicuOOypWugZKVLGNm0IweVCaZ/DJDIH gNbpvVwjcKYrx85m9cBVEBUGaQP6AT7qlVCkrf50v8bofSIyVa2xmubbAwwFA1oxoOusjPIE J3iadrwpFvsZjF5uHAKS+7wHLoW9hVzOnLbX6ajk5Hf8Pb1m+VH/E8bPBNNYKkfTtypTDUCj NYcd27tjnXfG+SDs/EXNUAIRefCyvaRG7oRYF3Ec+2RgQDRnmmjCjoQNbFrJvJkFHlPeHaeS BosGY+XWKydnmsfY7SSnjAzLUGAFhLd/XDVpb1Een2XucPpKvt9ORF+48gy12FA5GduRLhQU vK4tU7ojoem/G23PcowM1CwPurC8sAVsQb9KmwTGh7rVz3ks3w/zfGBy3+WmLg++C2Wct6nM Pd8/6CBVjEWqD06/RjI2AnjIq5fSEH/BIfXXfC68nMp9BZoy3So4ZsbOlBmtAPvMYX6U8VwD TNeBxJu5Ex0Izf1NV9CzC3nNaFUYOY8KfN01X5SExAoVTr09ewARAQABzSVLcnp5c3p0b2Yg S296bG93c2tpIDxrcnprQGtlcm5lbC5vcmc+wsGPBBMBCgA5AhsDBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBJvQfg4MUfjVlne3VBuTQ307QWKbBQJp2mE8AAoJEBuTQ307QWKbeaIP /ihHTkTW4KsN/DQ945JJbyu5tI0J80Wue7QyyLPglyKfhgb5cLLNPpOC8cCIJsc7+W3i2P38 s2c1cOH6CYGE7E9ur3Vfme8NW2S2I/Z8VC7bZnzyS23wT17LrsdS/qCpx4o8U+pt/xdXDKph EGRYrIEmMpUWvyYzyYKGIe25FtaayIIKpq8eZYyFcp2f/sG5IkOW5uZzHPMPdcm87jU7fyuQ rAU2vx9r+ulUfQ/q9Z2roC/ode3l7t2pN7BCBCsUDp6JCrUyZrtT1e7EbA0ZRP3aOBNk2P2E DQOgJGjGdO5Yx2Y9LFtltu6JbsBJHi1syGRX3AtQYOMc4Y1WGoeZJmMlvKj2ZqqXNkcWi2DS IQEWB0uW6CqFsBBIMGDa+6OzdaVO/uAVXWDWml02Men3CILdI1MbVjoh8ECqYUY7OQ+JJvNN vnliuq5WM3Ghd3jg/LZZrxXjdIginRHFQCjIJYLKpLZWm1/iDFedcfzqRNYmTtqscdCNHW41 oT3Z7BmO9xwdjuwBS6nmS6JJwkbf5Ot2QR4pB/DRU7ZwjT1qHe+9r9gF32wXVQatHNGK/VVu sfwOnkdxCWkp/qb2gdQRmZh+SedStWshigH6sNfuHBloF/q+hjMRc8b2m326OZdrbSHwY1Sz vti8Hn7n8NjdHO9LKB7BIdjkA9DA5WsqOuVCzsFNBFVDXDQBEADNkrQYSREUL4D3Gws46JEo Z9HEQOKtkrwjrzlw/tCmqVzERRPvz2Xg8n7+HRCrgqnodIYoUh5WsU84N03KlLueMNsWLJBv BaubYN4JuJIdRr4dS4oyF1/fQAQPHh8Thpiz0SAZFx6iWKB7Qrz3OrGCjTPcW6eiOMheesVS 5hxietSmlin+SilmIAPZHx7n242u6kdHOh+/SyLImKn/dh9RzatVpUKbv34eP1wAGldWsRxb f3WP9pFNObSzI/Bo3kA89Xx2rO2roC+Gq4LeHvo7ptzcLcrqaHUAcZ3CgFG88CnA6z6lBZn0 WyewEcPOPdcUB2Q7D/NiUY+HDiV99rAYPJztjeTrBSTnHeSBPb+qn5ZZGQwIdUW9YegxWKvX XHTwB5eMzo/RB6vffwqcnHDoe0q7VgzRRZJwpi6aMIXLfeWZ5Wrwaw2zldFuO4Dt91pFzBSO IpeMtfgb/Pfe/a1WJ/GgaIRIBE+NUqckM+3zJHGmVPqJP/h2Iwv6nw8U+7Yyl6gUBLHFTg2h YnLFJI4Xjg+AX1hHFVKmvl3VBHIsBv0oDcsQWXqY+NaFahT0lRPjYtrTa1v3tem/JoFzZ4B0 p27K+qQCF2R96hVvuEyjzBmdq2esyE6zIqftdo4MOJho8uctOiWbwNNq2U9pPWmu4vXVFBYI GmpyNPYzRm0QPwARAQABwsF2BBgBCgAgAhsMFiEEm9B+DgxR+NWWd7dUG5NDfTtBYpsFAmna YUkACgkQG5NDfTtBYptX+BAApg32CkxwNucNEi8WfWA8oKkW0y8YDuY6ORMo9FWNGiT/OTy0 vyJrLocrpn86zwfjVp+eCrssPYh8eqJfnWqmYv6ACQtHPYzPZQ3mSo8H97Z01oUxITzCxpXm ZkLgPIqtDPcC2E3dPM/fVxcyowM8XsaMA9wcsaUYrta8toOq2b9tKcjleKMfMrm0gQ9u7wUc QbLkwj6TCLOwucb07GXzLTNF9PZmaDUpKAZjMjmrW+le+SFvQbhamx0rxLWPR0NWntXpbCn+ +ACch03p/JyTBVktxFsFyCt7pTPE1kEaeuXBTe/a2D9iQvRxRW19LvuO2e59/u1wYUiH/orz wbIC2S4dBsPAPihL3ztOU1yE86GPyQtSE0kU+/7snnLt4QGi6PChf3t5gnNjAzjUUovO8rgI c+5yN5heq5loYHgK6OQ9OlHzsPHO9e9MOQcKlFycs1pyijFGzDwdNUm/SchK8iWT2QApTx4A K9bCVaboTA2T77QYkRcRJYSsO1alGX0ome/hMLD1daXlkrNUp1HWa3K4iytLRXjCSIorWiGs n+q3krnpXu3TFkA8qtOFZMdnIiFuiq1yLT8hptsV5xh1TA2nsVvSYiaCr3q4s4BKjS/KrLDb qoxzw8ISjdUp4pA85vb6YLCmb39NgidD+7PmAr65lBNveIFynTgsja1rRQ4= In-Reply-To: <643cb7a7-d817-441b-913f-7f78e7710e5c@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 24/09/2026 14:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hey, > > I am trying to adapt b4 review to DT workflow with DT patchwork and I > think interpretation of current patch status needs customization. I have > in .gitconfig: > > [b4] > pw-review-state = needs-ack > pw-accept-state = not-applicable > pw-discard-state = changes-requested > > But b4 review tui in Patchwork status does not show any patches under > Needs ACK. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/devicetree/list/ > > To recap, our statuses are used like: > 0. "New": not processed by any automation > 1. "Under Review": being processed by automation > 2. "Needs ACK": Actually waiting for our review or being reviewed. This > is what we want to see in list of patches. > 3. "Changes requested": Patch rejected with changes needed > 4. "Not applicable": Patch was reviewed but handled elsewhere as most of > work is like that. > > Either I miss some .gitconfig options or b4 is missing such > customization. If the latter, can you add a feature-request for this? I > would like to adopt b4 and move away from our internal scripting... > Ah, and if that matters: b4 v0.16.0 Best regards, Krzysztof