From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA824A37; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31A20C433D6; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:29:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1666124989; bh=HVoRdeuniV0NvpQy56LEkes0CuGtQr4sfZcQVvfL1pU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eCDdeU8P0w5Lbfyg2BCsuN/+/LzsI8rBuhb1HaZNSTNaBn9fx1UuNDnc9sf4kq4Xw D/cWZLpr+EGhI9smqRl3gpN9nRryjHN4wuDCLUog4/YWr/+VtUiUJePRHuZif0lxfD SnURx5acl/LepADurL3/kDoQMqPFNC+qM+EXRXczoaOj43h+OpvC6RhurVChWU9bvH vfb+4gsT8mxIcD6IxiYQMfmh1an8ER7YN5rtWfJLINkMSl29hZPelgFKIS5yNXXQ0D iQ4c+4KUJUuYCp8+KmNsTsMk03TTI3qfRTGJn79kTJMF5xKzmlJQ2RrfLCM76AROmu IihpDSqA9PjTg== Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:29:44 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: Maxime Ripard , users@linux.kernel.org, tools@linux.kernel.org Subject: Re: b4 bugs / future improvements Message-ID: References: <20221018153620.tyuedbldi2ofbe2x@houat> <20221018201804.na5x7lohm4yszg5h@nitro.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qrJDWDdC513xdzih" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221018201804.na5x7lohm4yszg5h@nitro.local> X-Cookie: Lake Erie died for your sins. --qrJDWDdC513xdzih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 04:18:04PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 05:36:20PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > - Generally speaking, rebasing a b4 series is a bit troublesome: > >=20 > > - It's a bit tedious to do. One needs to rebase and then edit the > > cover letter by hand without b4 being involved. I don't think doing > > the rebase interface all over again is reasonable, but maybe we > > could add a subcommand to set a new base? > Interesting. I'm not sure I fully understand the problem, but then all my > rebase tests were all very simple cases of running "git rebase " > Is there a reason why you have to manually edit the cover letter after a > rebase? If you're doing an inter-version changelog it's common to say something like "rebased against foo" in there. It's a bit clearer about things than base-commit. --qrJDWDdC513xdzih Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmNPDLgACgkQJNaLcl1U h9A7xQf+MgiUmGjBblInwKOCStmzNNzwk6kCOCziqxms0I4mLGal3lGVd0WND/zc GIeRZFTzkfpBjMI8/+pHfIiCfgANc3egWoVWkqFaJiKQ4TyEXuGSZev4u5OJNHj6 1wH91KdYIOPaVVommecfamC7XHhls3P+gK0CAQNEBoerjON7veq7uocfm91VIpNZ REo90zNxc7qbQ1c0YhiperJHWInet/4rD8LFhm8hb18WBSzNZ4+0q4JoLC1u7p7I Me8ruc3kbgUWSoKAhVrj6txjLxgAMFmPNIY7eJEqVpBq96VrMcXZ3EMAhfSKeSYy hR3JsVHDtMMiBPONP7QI0O7V16ckZQ== =G8on -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qrJDWDdC513xdzih--