From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
tools@linux.kernel.org, users@linux.kernel.org
Subject: b4 patch subject issue
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:17:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3Pz9Y9Mn1FtnqR1@mail.local> (raw)
Hello Konstantin,
I found a small issue in how b4 handles path subjects:
linux$ b4 shazam -tsl 5640233.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher
Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/5640233.DvuYhMxLoT%40kreacher/t.mbox.gz
Checking for newer revisions on https://lore.kernel.org/all/
Analyzing 9 messages in the thread
Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
---
[PATCH v2 1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
+ Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4803444.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher
+ Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
[PATCH v2 2/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
+ Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2143522.irdbgypaU6@kreacher
+ Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
[PATCH v2 3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions
+ Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/13157911.uLZWGnKmhe@kreacher
+ Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
[PATCH v2 4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions
+ Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3225614.44csPzL39Z@kreacher
+ Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
[PATCH v2 5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal
+ Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (✓ DKIM/intel.com)
+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2224609.iZASKD2KPV@kreacher
+ Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
---
Total patches: 5
---
Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos:
Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions
Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal
---
Patchwork: setting state on patchwork.ozlabs.org/rtc-linux
-> under-review : [v2,1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
-> under-review : [v2,2/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
-> under-review : [v2,3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions
-> under-review : [v2,4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions
-> under-review : [v2,5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal
linux$ git log --oneline -5
dfe59ef27467 (HEAD -> plop) rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal
f02e8f979e26 rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions
a9f73fde7380 rtc: rtc-cmos:
70258aa62244 rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
1c399f3090f7 rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe()
For some reason, 3/5 is losing its full subject. I didn't investigate
but I'm using a freshly updated b4 0.10.1 on fedora.
Let me know if I can be of any assistance to debug that.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-15 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-15 20:17 Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2022-11-15 20:28 ` b4 patch subject issue Konstantin Ryabitsev
2022-11-15 20:43 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3Pz9Y9Mn1FtnqR1@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tools@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=users@linux.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox