From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com (mail-wr1-f48.google.com [209.85.221.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D696D38 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id k7so37313128wrd.13 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=AVeRmzpXCHMWPMXhChZz/3lUJWRFf6iJxZa2xpL+PLU=; b=W3UNa7A+/QwRKxegLc/eR1wdEHWzlCIz5CSpj7mRRsO2m7YeGOYsn8g+brzVTa58HW vitBmGKosHz6aYneaNzAX1n3ksZx+P3c8ffnYopnYibkd8jAFZ163KCD8Ox5HnT6gWBQ kyeaMHxSdTFryNyWFCT4NzrusAq2IcgxSwJwp00v7qvJdF7dTsTQCc3gug5yHvnWPoW0 UBbGLnPGDsn2OAW0GLFcxEJq8HBx4Vo36qrxUIH5wqhUmQMocsUwjNQhWUwTtumRKcoE kp6+vymxtUQhhK9+jL+d8kauaoZNNhLNYQeTbLIhNizw88IN6ROXuUb6bR1hNJfdbYji t9OA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=AVeRmzpXCHMWPMXhChZz/3lUJWRFf6iJxZa2xpL+PLU=; b=mDntLLMFLi8MbHRS/1spye7cggtHTsJ2qyg0EYhPCrVHsoipQGRdnHsQc3F/ogRQX1 fPcp06/9+CPrV3nz/dfUlnUS0YPSpKVK3tyMHPIUM7iKnWN0YoL9az0zG8oR8H3BRwhU lWeCOCFoMeMgyALkFQtRqMCXuldiKXvTQQIrAVJrQb4IrUs+WdPRAPLX5vPrfJAyvDJs ndVpYO2mOeiDDEK76jXKanON6Buck3Bduz6UNm6H3hVNODZwsobQGsQdgaEXJjnZv5bX HPO+msgkmiKqeLeDHLN02iWidH4qpAQ7J/A46XcnllR9o/uj97z8yArLPlZy+gcl1bpg b1KA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ShkfU0st3lpA9qlws7t1H9qtu2hmLMW8h/HdUMEEAOf8eTBjt j1jFo2OCFfrSDaHYe5HOzry3DA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwwGMETbv9RvowMuADg7Kvw0WfsZwuhoxMUuDHJjM/O83OXOcs5NbMl0jofLs3awnFU5cHRQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8b84:: with SMTP id o4mr17734507wra.108.1633441842291; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 06:50:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([95.148.6.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g1sm2697456wmk.2.2021.10.05.06.50.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 06:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:50:40 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev , Rob Herring , users@linux.kernel.org, tools@linux.kernel.org Subject: Re: Acked-by missed when applying Message-ID: References: <20211005125328.najo7q5f7pwxdrfy@meerkat.local> <20211005153735.7a50b3c6@coco.lan> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20211005153735.7a50b3c6@coco.lan> On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:53:28 -0400 > Konstantin Ryabitsev escreveu: > > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:48:04PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > Can you think of a reason why `b4` missed Greg's Ack here? > > > > > > > > Because you applied the first v2 patch, not the second v2 threaded to > > > > the 1st one that Greg acked. > > > > > > Not sure I understand. > > > > > > This is the thread of the patch I merged: > > > > > > https://i.imgur.com/k4hD9kO.png > > > > > > Greg's Ack is located in the 5th message down. > > > > If you look at the thread overview, you'll notice that there are two messages > > with identical subjects, sent 3 weeks apart: > > > > 2021-09-02 12:47 [PATCH v2] mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: cleanup drvdata > > > > and > > > > 2021-09-28 6:58 [PATCH v2] mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: cleanup drvdata > > > > As far as b4 is treating things internally, the second v2 (from Sep 28) > > starts a new thread, so any trailers sent to the Sep-02 version will not > > apply to the Sep-29 version and vice versa. > > The patch is actually identical (and I guess it is also identical > to version 1). I ended forgetting that I had already submitted it during > the merge window. So, I ended forgetting to either increase its version > number or to add a RESEND to it. > > Sorry for the mess. If it wasn't you, it would have been someone else. Thanks for highlighting issue. Hopefully it can be resolved trivially. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog