From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603491E8320 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 15:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772293988; cv=none; b=tBz+YldpkzlfYxFXw2D6gUEb1RagZhwRUNy2kBycu3nSc86letetDYdiV2kJkQ4+4n+tbypmWxq26Cf5u1zqXVU8wk0J2/ZTb/qo83ekmSzOh7X3NJA1TuKDNgaMgMeWrOGx+gP5mVS1f2h68TkpnqWtEiTQ8qTQxdNpX+cgpJk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772293988; c=relaxed/simple; bh=klnPjgnIUfLby334Fa/aTJWpd5xPgGTUImrKZxsnx50=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cQFFLMNwN1oCQr/WPAcOPfftOP3Fi+lcvOAywstyj/Haiattycjz0IbfryZvYSfgBH52HsaQs+CRZ0F9kv7vJV+sUXRjEUhdeLwYVN+LyKj1YhU41cag2lDfLvlGgjYN2AGiWEiyYrtD7t3ybZDp9MR5QSoql1KzmCKqezOmQ/U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rM956OCb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rM956OCb" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id 4A185C4AF09; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 15:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E060C116D0; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 15:53:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772293988; bh=klnPjgnIUfLby334Fa/aTJWpd5xPgGTUImrKZxsnx50=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rM956OCb6QZVz/zTlkOnDMZOYB3G6NLa6dJBOXjTbSef0lLt+MF12Z6kgvcgy3ryF 6QmHPRsFGHpb8AxjbdkZctb0mF/jWhnO77477mpCH+DsrHCahQAsO00a6lhUwEhnZL RaXZO+EJ2NU6YzKfSDSvMWmHdzClwcBih3JS4kjYfF1PdG+3k1RVIBFzsiKMHaHnVM OT/RbKEvNt1rGEOpdHugzXyspv3ZowGfNgS8YKu4mEsKgTSLmKQHjw5IWsgzTZPZFA O3cyU9FU+Kh7rnQpBeLVJ1C3LQNNR37t/YMT1v350DHW6Zdv+ZcW1er3fd8S4jKiMR WfROkqn8ulbag== Received: by finisterre.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BCF31AC597D; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 15:53:05 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 15:53:05 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: users@kernel.org, tools@kernel.org Subject: Re: b4 review available in master Message-ID: References: <20260227-imported-aromatic-guppy-ad3dca@lemur> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sHd5U6ozAlHMg5sF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260227-imported-aromatic-guppy-ad3dca@lemur> X-Cookie: Think big. Pollute the Mississippi. --sHd5U6ozAlHMg5sF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 02:53:07PM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > - AI-assisted review using an external agent (Claude Code, Gemini CLI, > OpenAI Codex CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI) =E2=80=94 agent findings are pr= ivate to the > maintainer and can then be selectively incorporated into the review > - Patchwork integration: browse series, view CI check results, track se= ries > directly from Patchwork, and automatically synchronise Patchwork stat= e as > you work As requested since it looks like the textual thing I reported might be a bit annoying to resolve a couple of bits of feedback just from reading the announce: - It'd be good to have a workflow for syncing the reviews between machines (with privacy!), for example I move between my laptop and desktop semi regularly. - An integration with non-patchwork CI would be useful, perhaps this looks a bit like the agent stuff above? It's "hand off to an external tool and some time later see what the tool/a separate results collection tool had to say about things"? - If this works for me I think I'm likely to want an "applied but not taken" state, I CI the actual commits I end up merging and do end up looking back at the results sometimes. - My existing tooling has an "I'll apply this at rcX" state which I use moderately heavily when I'm happy but want to allow time for other people to review. Other units of time are available, I'm mostly using the rcs as a proxy for that (and it's very useful for "apply this after the merge window closes). --sHd5U6ozAlHMg5sF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmmjD1wACgkQJNaLcl1U h9ARQAf/ZD4ISJo+gF2pw26c7WHO/x7F5TTOpvl2OYYrWub+R/w3rTzKqzOQ0lSn pvIZkIHn0R/gpY7SskdD40uima6FI4YwnglU/OXg9arrA7o6CI1aNGBbO2OBhvK2 NpLrY3fBAWu+COv2rpmW1sfPiF2Xz7oogoMVNkGnLLJ4Py/sDt53BBWeQdciUSgG fDEJFeE4SwUTsNgVridv/45zvZPltQQwwEyViZ/Ohc6J1hYGvXv6X/KRvCSAVcen sqYa2zNuKDzU3AhLFUFtyA7rXIvDNRAMsLymZv7FhQiGa2a8lc/2q+TBNsVSp8u7 k5zWjjM747BMnvD42OGuSIG6kFLvVw== =e+5d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sHd5U6ozAlHMg5sF--