From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.200]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.2016.1601753229284222799 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:27:09 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=none, err=permanent DNS error (domain: perches.com, ip: 216.40.44.200, mailfrom: joe@perches.com) Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F8B181D330D; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 19:27:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:599:982:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1540:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3874:4321:5007:6248:6742:6743:7974:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12297:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14096:14097:14659:14721:14777:21080:21325:21433:21627:30054:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:19,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: bell15_5909bf3271af X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2863 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.133.149]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 19:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements From: Joe Perches To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: Mark Brown , tools@linux.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Valdis =?UTF-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Martin Blumenstingl , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:27:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> References: <1601233948-11629-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <160132172369.55460.9237357219623604216.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20200929113745.GB4799@sirena.org.uk> <20201001110150.GA6715@sirena.org.uk> <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 15:15 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > (Adding tools and Konstantin Ryabitsev) > > > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series. > > > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the > > series. > > > > Can this be improved in b4? > > So, the following logic should be applied: > > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was > cherry-picked out of the series > > Is that an accurate summary? Exactly so, thanks.