From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A984B6132 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:55:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=8Gc1XaSWZdZOIY4FVdYl16DNrBoTruC8xGxukIvFdaY=; t=1694674530; x=1695884130; b=m3dokknW3Mvua7rQYYk72f5V/ArJ9u3SkxR6zFwBJRyQ3zw o00aSvf/adgVlfENKl4N1Y/y9xyK9LyI3M3WPc2HyrDKKWbxubbkdBRPe8fE24pFBbEN6BN0K26Sz CfGLU0p5pJcPpf3xSdKe/i58LMH3KfeuQhCDHl81ANfSslAl9EqOHPMak9kVj05kaWyH6iAbpjxkj HTo5MmpXx2uSMcIjU1yKpYsQ7tS80ws6RJDcV6uvMsny+meE+MYNVXfPZzffR7k/Gv1dun+k0dXi6 FKSjrjLLYoR3reCHrRN7vVdHGGCyYU4Q4GB0VHdOf9krULpQTiUJkXnUaVbwVM1Q==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qggG6-00GhAe-1X; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:55:26 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: b4 tag parsing too lax? From: Johannes Berg To: Kees Cook , Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: "tools@linux.kernel.org" , Kalle Valo Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:55:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <202309131601.979D5790@keescook> References: <202309131243.5D508355@keescook> <20230913-lunchbox-anemia-a19bc1@meerkat> <202309131601.979D5790@keescook> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 23:04 +0000, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:00:27PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 12:44:43PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > I just saw this in commit ef6e1997da63 ("wifi: mac80211: fortify the > > > spinlock against deadlock by interrupt"): > > >=20 > > > Reviewed-by: tag, or it goes automatically? Heh, that's kinda funny. > > While it's possible that b4 did this, it's not any current version. It didn't. > Okay, weird! I have no idea how that got there then. >=20 > I should have CCed Johannes Berg to start with, but now I have. :) I'm > curious what the workflow for that patch was -- do you use b4? (Perhaps > this was a b4 behavior accidentally back in May?) >=20 We use patchwork in wireless to assign the work between Kalle and I. I guess I could still apply patches using b4 though, but don't, at this point. So I guess it's more a bug to report to patchwork, but I'm not sure how much good that will do unless we fix it ourselves :) johannes