From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5808377283067691915=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: nicolasoliver03 at gmail.com
Subject: [tpm2] Re: Infineon SLB 9670 lifetime
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:39:31 +0000
Message-ID: <20200221003931.2820.93594@ml01.vlan13.01.org>
In-Reply-To: 695e0b89-b07d-2bf8-f369-fdf8c5ab8658@mikronika.com.pl
List-ID: <tpm2@lists.01.org>
To: tpm2@lists.01.org

--===============5808377283067691915==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Good information Tomasz!

In the Nuvoton NPCT42x specs, there is no indication of expected useful lif=
etime.

https://media.digikey.com/pdf/Data%20Sheets/Nuvoton%20PDFs/NPCT42x_Prelimin=
ary_Rev1.1.pdf

But I also found that there is a TCG subgroup dedicated to the Industrial s=
pace, with representation from Infineon

https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/work-groups/industrial/

And they are recommending the use of TPMs to protect industrial IoT equipme=
nts apparently:

https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/standards-securing-industrial-eq=
uipment/
https://www.iiconsortium.org/pdf/IIC_PUB_G4_V1.00_PB-3.pdf
--===============5808377283067691915==--