From: Roberts, William C <william.c.roberts at intel.com>
To: tpm2@lists.01.org
Subject: [tpm2] Re: Lifecycle of handles and contexts
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 18:56:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab025685a774450f457da79fc1df289bdbd08f40.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: BN8PR15MB27533D241112AB1F3EA9D0C7F28F9@BN8PR15MB2753.namprd15.prod.outlook.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2135 bytes --]
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 22:17 +0000, Kenneth Goldman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 17:36 +0000, Kenneth Goldman wrote:
> > > It depends.
> > >
> > > Windows seems to have a large keystore, so you probably don't
> > > have to
> > > ever flush.
> > >
> > > Linux in kernel RM manages keys across processes but not within
> > > processes, so you still have to flush.
> >
> > This is also how TBS works on Windows.
>
> Not on my Windows 10. I just created 32 keys with one process. Now
> there are
> 32 loaded keys.
Did the process exit? I always thought TBS was spec compliant:
"The RM also monitors connections, and removes table entries and
ContextFlushes leftover sessions
when the caller closes a connection." from Section 2.3.3 of:
https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TSS_2p0_TAB_ResourceManager_v1p0_r18_04082019_pub.pdf
The table entries include transient handles and their associated
virtual mapping.
> OK, the Windows RM swaps them out, but the application never
> sees that.
>
> I don't know what the RM limit is, but it's certainly far more than
> the TPM
> itself.
>
> getcapability.exe -cap 1 -pr 80000000
> 32 handles
> 80ffffe0
> 80ffffe1
> 80ffffe2
> 80ffffe3
> 80ffffe4
> 80ffffe5
> 80ffffe6
> 80ffffe7
> 80ffffe8
> 80ffffe9
> 80ffffea
> 80ffffeb
> 80ffffec
> 80ffffed
> 80ffffee
> 80ffffef
> 80fffff0
> 80fffff1
> 80fffff2
> 80fffff3
> 80fffff4
> 80fffff5
> 80fffff6
> 80fffff7
> 80fffff8
> 80fffff9
> 80fffffa
> 80fffffb
> 80fffffc
> 80fffffd
> 80fffffe
> 80ffffff
These look like virtual handles. The spec also states,
"In responses that return handles, these handles MUST be virtualized
before returning the
response to the caller:
These virtual handles MUST be unique per connection".
I don't think anyone actually makes them unique per connection.
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-25 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-25 18:56 Roberts, William C [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-30 18:11 [tpm2] Re: Lifecycle of handles and contexts Kenneth Goldman
2022-07-19 22:17 Kenneth Goldman
2022-07-19 2:25 Tim K
2022-07-18 21:35 Roberts, William C
2022-07-18 17:36 Kenneth Goldman
2022-07-18 17:02 Tim K
2022-07-18 14:45 Roberts, William C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab025685a774450f457da79fc1df289bdbd08f40.camel@intel.com \
--to=tpm2@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox