tpmdd-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
To: Nikos Mavrogianopoulos
	<n.mavrogiannopoulos-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
	<nmav-c5N7Ur/I1ocdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: trousers-tech-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	openssl-dev-MCmKBN63+BlAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	GnuTLS development list
	<gnutls-devel-f8S/fY/i+OXSWulAQ3bEYg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [gnutls-devel] Proposal for the ASN.1 form of TPM1.2 and TPM2 keys
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 10:13:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1482776020.2430.19.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F37418F5-0ECC-4F8B-981A-2ED74FAADA51-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, 2016-12-26 at 08:18 +0100, Nikos Mavrogianopoulos wrote:
> I'd like both backwards and forward compatibility actually, exactly
> like x509. If an informational field is added like the key usage that
> I mentioned, I doubt you'd like all the previous consumers
> incompatible.

OK, so there's a fundamental difference between a v3 X509 certificate
and a TPM key: An X509 certificate is a signature over a set of v1 TBS
data, a public key and a bundle of attributes.  To verify the
certificate or extract the key, you don't need to know what the
attributes are, so you can still "use" the certificate in that form. 
 However, you can't get the v1 tool to obey the v3 constraints on the
certificate because it doesn't understand them.

The ASN.1 description of a TPM key contains the actual binary
representation of the key plus a set of information which explains to
the consuming code how to use the key.  Since I can't think of a way of
making use of the key without understanding all of the information
about how to use it, I think it is beneficial that v1 consumers don't
try to use v2 key information because the resulting failure will excite
the TPM's dictionary attack protection.

I gave an example of one such extension: policy authorisations, but
they're definitely of the "if you don't understand these, you can't use
the key" variety.  Perhaps if you can give an example of a potentially
compatible extensions it would help me to see your point and give us a
means of moving forwards.

Thanks,

James

>  For other extensions which make the structure totally incompatible
> you can use the critical flag. Anyway even the original struct is OK,
> it is exactly like any other key structs we have.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-26 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-23 18:06 Proposal for the ASN.1 form of TPM1.2 and TPM2 keys James Bottomley
2016-12-23 20:12 ` Richard Levitte
     [not found]   ` <20161223.211218.817856866219152234.levitte-MCmKBN63+BlAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-23 20:22     ` [openssl-dev] " James Bottomley
2016-12-24 13:25 ` Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
     [not found]   ` <CAJU7zaKjXhKJ-3PJD6XrLW2hTixEqL0B56epbqG3trw3jmXjVg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-24 16:13     ` [gnutls-devel] " James Bottomley
2016-12-25  9:18       ` Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
2016-12-25 18:44         ` [gnutls-devel] " James Bottomley
2016-12-25 21:08           ` Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
2016-12-25 23:47             ` [gnutls-devel] " James Bottomley
2016-12-26  7:18               ` Nikos Mavrogianopoulos
     [not found]                 ` <F37418F5-0ECC-4F8B-981A-2ED74FAADA51-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-26 18:13                   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-12-26 20:13                     ` Nikos Mavrogianopoulos
     [not found]                       ` <671CBF50-E114-4FD1-995A-523C7B63F8D5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-29 23:57                         ` [gnutls-devel] " James Bottomley
2016-12-27 15:35           ` Erwann Abalea
2016-12-30 15:40           ` Ken Goldman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1482776020.2430.19.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley-d9phhud1jfjcxq6kfmz53/egyhegw8jk@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gnutls-devel-f8S/fY/i+OXSWulAQ3bEYg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=n.mavrogiannopoulos-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=nmav-c5N7Ur/I1ocdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=openssl-dev-MCmKBN63+BlAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=trousers-tech-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).