From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix the cleanup of struct tpm_chip Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:26:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20160209052655.GA12657@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1454988630-27942-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1454988630-27942-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device() > will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called. > This patch fixes the issue by adding put_device() to devres list of > the parent device. Erm, if you do this, then shouldn't the device_unregister change to device_del to keep the kref balanced? Jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140