From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix the cleanup of struct tpm_chip Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:19:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20160209061951.GA29607@intel.com> References: <1454988630-27942-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20160209052655.GA12657@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160209052655.GA12657-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:55PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:30:30AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > If the initialization fails before tpm_chip_register(), put_device() > > will be not called, which causes release callback not to be called. > > This patch fixes the issue by adding put_device() to devres list of > > the parent device. > > Erm, if you do this, then shouldn't the device_unregister change to > device_del to keep the kref balanced? Yes, it should. Weird, I added pr_info() (temporarily) to tpm_dev_release() and did occur only once and no crashes whatsoever. Anyway, you're right. > Jason /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140