From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_crb: fix bad name pointer usage with struct resource Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:31:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20160218173140.GA5899@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1455668874-13261-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20160217045219.GA26086@obsidianresearch.com> <20160217093623.GA9831@intel.com> <20160217142016.GA6951@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160217142016.GA6951-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:20:16PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Maybe for the release the safest bet would be anyway explicitly not > use the name field? That's the safest bet given the release time > frame. nulling it in the acpi paths of tis and crb, if you know those are broken seems good for a rc. I haven't looked at what other options there are, I suspect it needs strdup due to how the drivers are working with acpi.. Jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140