From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] remaining tpmdd fixes for Linux 4.5 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:52:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20160222175245.GA22828@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20160220081705.GA12981@intel.com> <20160222145023.GA28365@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160222145023.GA28365-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: James Morris , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, keyrings-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Wilck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > I already pushed a fix to my master for this issue: > > https://github.com/jsakkine/linux-tpmdd/commit/6386544ad7bceb3d0248b85da29d4d99eebe9161 The goal is to reduce the number of #ifdef'd code segments so we have fewer problems in future with a large .config test matrix. I'd rather see a __maybe_unused annotation instead. Jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140