From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Rework of tpm_tis to share common logic across phy's (lpc/spi/-i2c-) Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 21:36:14 +0300 Message-ID: <20160530183614.GA17850@intel.com> References: <1463610953-2766-1-git-send-email-christophe-h.ricard@st.com> <20160526122635.GA31557@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Huewe Cc: Christophe Ricard , jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com, ashley@ashleylai.com, tpmdd@selhorst.net, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, christophe-h.ricard@st.com, jean-luc.blanc@st.com, benoit.houyere@st.com, Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Thanks Peter! I'll add your and Stefans Reviewed/Tested-by's before I merge these to next (will happen around rc5). /Jarkko On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:59:10AM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote: > Thanks for all your efforts!!! I'm sorry I couldn't participate more. :( > So thanks a lot to all of you for taking care of this. > > > a quick testrun (x86) seemed okay and the patchset looks good to me > reviewed-by: Peter Huewe > tested-by: Peter Huewe > > > I'll try to give it a more detailled testrun on the spi and i2c tpms I have and let you know if I find something. > > > Since we are making a big change in the subsystem - does it make sense to deprecate, the old, vendor specific, mainly 1.1b, tpm drivers? > Every time I check on a system, they initally are running on these old drivers instead of tpm_tis. :/ > For now I would probably group them under a new kconfig symbol (deprecated vendor specific drivers) so they are still available for users who really want to use them, but don't get selected by default in distro kernels. > > > Thanks, > Peter >