Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] TPM2.0: Added eventlog support for TPM2.0

[Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 01:59:00PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:09:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 
> > 1. Does TCG have a standard for this I2C binding in a DT like they have
> >    for ACPI?
> > 2. Can I expect that the binding has the same fields with the same names
> >    in some other platform that POWER? For example, what if there was an
> >    ARM based platform. Would the same binding work there?
> > 
> > I'm looking for document or something where you got your information.
> > Right now your code is based on nothing from my point of view.
> 
> There is no real standards body for device tree right now.
> 
> Submitting a Docuemtation patch to the device tree maintainers is the
> best we have today, and we as the TPM community should review it to
> ensure it makes sense from our perspective.
> 
> Other DT platforms like ARM will use the bindings defined in
> Documentation/DeviceTree.

So how do I know that this the right way to specify the attibutes for a
TPM device and all vendors would like to have the attributes like this?

> Jason

/Jarkko

------------------------------------------------------------------------------