From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] tpm: TPM2.0 eventlog securityfs support Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:51:19 -0600 Message-ID: <20160901165119.GE6479@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1472532619-22170-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160830071032.GB6215@intel.com> <57C71A48.8020505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160901134501.GA14627@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160901134501.GA14627-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:45:01PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > PS. It's better to keep the attribute names the same since the code is > already depending those names even if I don't like the naming :) Yes, we cannot change the dt attribute names that IBM used in the original PPC patches, and Nayna, you should clarify that situation when talking to the Rob Herring, etc as the DT maintainers. It is not often they deal with patches from a company like IBM that has been using DT before the linux process started. Jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------------