From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER"
<tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
open list <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] tpm_crb: expand struct crb_control_area to struct crb_regs
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 17:07:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161009230737.GA23823@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161009183358.GB27764-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:33:58PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Sorry I missed this part.
> >
> > Here are the constraints for existing hardware:
> >
> > 1. All the existing CRB start only hardware has the iomem covering the
> > control area and registers for multiple localities.
> > 2. All the existing ACPI start hardware has only the control area.
> >
> > If you assume that SSDT does not have malicous behavior caused by either
> > a BIOS bug or maybe a rootkit, then the current patch works for all the
> > existing hardware.
> >
> > To counter-measure for unexpected behavior in non-existing hardware and
> > buggy or malicious firmware it probably make sense to use crb_map_res to
> > validate the part of the CRB registers that is not part of the control
> > area.
I don't know how much I'd assume BIOS authors do what you think - the
spec I saw for this seems very vauge.
Certainly checking that locality region falls within the acpi mapping
seems essential.
> > Doing it in the way you proposed does not work for ACPI start devices.
> >
> > For them it should be done in the same way as I'm doing in the existing
> > patch as for ACPI start devices the address below the control area are
> > never accessed. Having a separate crb_map_res for CRB start only devices
> > is sane thing to do for validation.
>
> Alternative is to do two structures crb_regs_head and crb_regs_tail,
> which might be cleaner. I'm fine with going either route.
Since the iomem doesn't actually exist for a configuration having two
pointers is the better choice. Make sure one is null for the
configuration that does not support it.
The negative offset thing is way too subtle.
Jason
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-09 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-09 0:15 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Locality support for the CRB driver Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <1475972112-2819-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 0:15 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] tpm_crb: expand struct crb_control_area to struct crb_regs Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <1475972112-2819-2-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 1:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20161009014256.GA8210-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 9:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <20161009093818.GG31891-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 16:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20161009164905.GA12551-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 18:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-09 18:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-09 18:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <20161009183358.GB27764-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 23:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
[not found] ` <20161009230737.GA23823-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-10 0:25 ` Winkler, Tomas
2016-10-10 3:26 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B542F7497-Jy8z56yoSI8MvF1YICWikbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-10 4:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-10 4:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-09 0:15 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] tpm_crb: encapsulate crb_wait_for_reg_32 Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-10-09 0:15 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] tpm_crb: request and relinquish locality 0 Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <1475972112-2819-4-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 6:35 ` Winkler, Tomas
2016-10-09 9:25 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <20161009092522.GE31891-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 9:43 ` Winkler, Tomas
[not found] ` <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B542F71A7-Jy8z56yoSI8MvF1YICWikbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 10:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-11 9:23 [PATCH 0/3] Locality support for the CRB driver Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <1476177787-15003-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-11 9:23 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] tpm_crb: expand struct crb_control_area to struct crb_regs Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161009230737.GA23823@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe-epgobjl8dl3ta4ec/59zmfatqe2ktcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).