From: Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Cc: tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Atmel I2C TPM transfer length issues
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 03:33:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170214023336.GC21340@lunn.ch> (raw)
Hi Jason
I'm hoping you can help me with an issue i have with an ATMEL I2C
TPM. I have one connected to an DLN2 USB-I2C bus controller. Initial
probe works, i can get the capabilites in /sys/class/tpm/tpm0,
tpm_version etc:
/sys/class/tpm/tpm0# cat caps
Manufacturer: 0x41544d4c
TCG version: 1.2
Firmware version: 66.4
But i have issues with pubek and other long i2c transfers:
/sys/class/tpm/tpm0# hexdump pubek
[11621.731960] i2c i2c-11: adapter quirk: msg too long (addr 0x0029, size 314, read)
[11621.738208] tpm tpm0: tpm_transmit: tpm_recv: error -95
The dln2 i2c bus controller has a transfer limit of 256 bytes. Getting
the pubek is doing a read for 314 bytes, which is getting rejected.
Is there any way to fragment the reads/writes? Looking at
tpm_i2c_atmel i don't see any. It seems the raw TCG commands need to
be passed in a single i2c transaction. The comment in i2c_atmel_recv()
suggests that multiple reads will always start from the beginning of
the TCG response. There are no comments in the send function, but i
guess an I2C start condition indicates the start of a new command?
Or am i missing something?
Can fragmentation happen at a higher layer?
Any other ideas?
Thanks
Andrew
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-14 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-14 2:33 Andrew Lunn [this message]
[not found] ` <20170214023336.GC21340-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-14 8:39 ` Atmel I2C TPM transfer length issues Peter Huewe
[not found] ` <A6C9A409-4FF4-41A7-AE4F-0727B1464447-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-14 13:05 ` Andrew Lunn
[not found] ` <20170214130511.GA32480-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-14 14:06 ` Peter Huewe
2017-02-14 17:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170214023336.GC21340@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew-g2dyl2zd6by@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).