From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christophe Ricard Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: drop int_queue from tpm_vendor_specific Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:58:08 +0100 Message-ID: <56F31170.4020702@gmail.com> References: <1458719734-13752-1-git-send-email-christophe-h.ricard@st.com> <20160323081755.GA6434@intel.com> <56F251F2.6050709@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56F251F2.6050709-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: jean-luc.blanc-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, ashley-fm2HMyfA2y6tG0bUXCXiUA@public.gmane.org, tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, christophe-h.ricard-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, benoit.houyere-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:20:09AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Drop field int_queue from tpm_vendor_specific as it is used only by > tpm_tis. Probably all of the fields should be eventually dropped and > moved to the private structures of different drivers but it is better to > do this one step at a time in order not to break anything. > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Don't you think read_queue could be dropped instead and merge with int_queue. I think they are both used for the same purpose and don't really see a mean to keep 2 queue. What do you think ? Best Regards Christophe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785351&iu=/4140