From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nayna Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] TPM2.0: Added eventlog support for TPM2.0 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 01:19:27 +0530 Message-ID: <57BF4BC7.4020309@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20160810171900.GA11543@intel.com> <57AC5802.1090109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160811125818.GA9303@intel.com> <57ADC1C0.4030406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160815212612.GC25212@intel.com> <57B36698.7040904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160816194853.GA26364@intel.com> <20160817041502.GA8656@intel.com> <57B3FD1B.9040606@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160817080914.GA8384@intel.com> <20160818195900.GD3676@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160818195900.GD3676-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe , Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: David Heller , tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, George Wilson List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On 08/19/2016 01:29 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:09:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> 1. Does TCG have a standard for this I2C binding in a DT like they have >> for ACPI? >> 2. Can I expect that the binding has the same fields with the same names >> in some other platform that POWER? For example, what if there was an >> ARM based platform. Would the same binding work there? >> >> I'm looking for document or something where you got your information. >> Right now your code is based on nothing from my point of view. > > There is no real standards body for device tree right now. > > Submitting a Docuemtation patch to the device tree maintainers is the > best we have today, and we as the TPM community should review it to > ensure it makes sense from our perspective. > > Other DT platforms like ARM will use the bindings defined in > Documentation/DeviceTree. > > Jason Thanks, Jarkko, for stating exactly what is required to review the patch. I will be providing the TPM Device Tree Documentation in my patchset as per Jason's suggestion. We'll also be updating the PAPR to document the new node. Thanks & Regards, - Nayna > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------