From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Cc: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Do not run tpm2_shutdown
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 16:04:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6c024ae-fe93-251a-a176-1f27f25b1e21@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170525155059.GA5151@obsidianresearch.com>
On 05/25/2017 11:50 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:12:36AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> The tpm2_shutdown does not work with the VTPM proxy driver since the
>> function only gets called when the backend file descriptor is already
>> closed and at this point no data can be sent anymore. A proper shutdown
>> would have to be initated by a user space application, such as a container
>> management stack, that sends the command via the character device before
>> terminating the TPM emulator.
>>
>> To avoid the tpm2_shutdown we introduce a TPM_CHIP_FLAG_NO_SHUTDOWN flag
>> that only the VTPM proxy driver sets. This also avoids misleading kernel
>> log messages.
> This seems strange to me..
>
> Why isn't ops null if the fd has gone away?
>
> What is the call flow that hits this?
In this function here.
static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
{
cdev_device_del(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev);
/* Make the chip unavailable. */
mutex_lock(&idr_lock);
idr_replace(&dev_nums_idr, NULL, chip->dev_num);
mutex_unlock(&idr_lock);
/* Make the driver uncallable. */
down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR);
chip->ops = NULL;
up_write(&chip->ops_sem);
}
The request cannot be deliver because the anonymous fd has been closed
already.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-25 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-25 13:12 [PATCH] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Do not run tpm2_shutdown Stefan Berger
[not found] ` <1495717956-14252-1-git-send-email-stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-25 15:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-05-25 20:04 ` Stefan Berger [this message]
2017-05-25 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-05-25 20:32 ` Stefan Berger
[not found] ` <9ff88c24-ca7a-1867-7284-17689fdac655-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-25 20:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20170525204414.GA13742-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-25 20:54 ` Stefan Berger
2017-05-25 21:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-05-25 22:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
[not found] ` <20170525223348.uh66n37dnvz3eptl-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-25 23:34 ` Stefan Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6c024ae-fe93-251a-a176-1f27f25b1e21@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).