From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: oops on uaccess faults outside of user addresses Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:54:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20130528085435.GC30172@gmail.com> References: <20130522.142847.791230763817666795.davem@davemloft.net> <20130528082514.GA29730@gmail.com> <20130528.015105.1513437101791265718.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pp4DMVuKRWeZxMGbVk6gMobY8ni97Vvcgw/CDuNExpo=; b=V3zgDSRdetIt3NAvJeRenVQfysdPBmJRkRp5lftvKBLl1neYQ0/YDVfYYtyqp0+Y2H DfAlke9C2Ddwx+D7mfMxLheDILyxaR26LpCUFHsLy65NlXIEiXZ5vUo8i8uDDNW6+jaw 7iEQHYp6hjMGq+eEQhPpv1pUX4iA7XMSAN6RsXCIR/cszo3uaeyc28sMBDGRwAqGTiZf T2/0nRaYREP2hQByom+Gke6FIOyQZRMoxdAtxvj5fCTYWM2a6QvO24KmP2fQkxKji/x8 fx8up2nhhQq1myE5a1iPICriQOvq/wVsVrGmsTQszbcMWukcIQrcM4HayKRpRjtsS+Or WRPw== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130528.015105.1513437101791265718.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: trinity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Miller Cc: luto@amacapital.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, trinity@vger.kernel.org * David Miller wrote: > From: Ingo Molnar > Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:25:14 +0200 > > > > > * David Miller wrote: > > > >> Please don't mix networking and non-networking changes into a patch > >> series. > > > > As explained in 0/5 the networking fix justifies the first 4 patches. The > > networking fix is independent of the first 4 patches. > > > >> Submit the networking patch to netdev@vger.kernel.org > > > > He Cc:-ed the patch to netdev@vger.kernel.org. If you agree with it then > > the fix should probably be picked up ASAP. > > He submitted it as part of a series which implies that it belongs together > with the others. And then described it in the 0/5 patch that it's not. It's also visible from the title, the changelog and the diff of the 5/5 patch that it's a separate fix. So please consider it submitted. Thanks, Ingo