From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: [regression] Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: Fix RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:58:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20130529075845.GA24506@gmail.com> References: <20130523104154.GA23650@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0000013ed1b8d0cc-ad2bb878-51bd-430c-8159-629b23ed1b44-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130523152458.GD23650@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0000013ed2297ba8-467d474a-7068-45b3-9fa3-82641e6aa363-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130523163901.GG23650@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0000013ed28b638a-066d7dc7-b590-49f8-9423-badb9537b8b6-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130524140114.GK23650@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0000013ed732b615-748f574f-ccb8-4de7-bbe4-d85d1cbf0c9d-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130527064834.GA2781@laptop> <0000013eec0006ee-0f8caf7b-cc94-4f54-ae38-0ca6623b7841-000000@email.amazonses.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Yl/ueB6TW76qRhQOPZsiR4Hdc3Q1WP7EzkYgvKDZoQw=; b=kuAIJpQy3QNGJE9xUdDXia/h/p+5nMYHoFuefh66KV2SS+7lNXS98mn9oYVFeXsKsX sWseJ8Zmp5SoobMFCVY3uPobpZ63Djz3HtcFijXgf7jJM8WWBBYMgEgdBvRLcdne3PPy XF6Kb/FVPi73OogNiaLwMXHRHJMAAdqfC3pmfIUSEkbvvaboCkQ7/FxDWkdS7O+FEiaJ msj/v6cctF0CGWUEB4UkYvLnNBBnI9EFPLKUPTeacrgNrxmN82dSXw0Vjr6QbVp8IsAr ysYIwEMKCZVaxynQHuFtOAXd9u+LhE4VB1sh0L8L2YAnLMuyzWw7VvF9N2fXGnJ87AUC fIOQ== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0000013eec0006ee-0f8caf7b-cc94-4f54-ae38-0ca6623b7841-000000@email.amazonses.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Al Viro , Vince Weaver , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , trinity@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, roland@kernel.org, infinipath@qlogic.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Or Gerlitz , Hugh Dickins * Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 27 May 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Before your patch pinned was included in locked and thus RLIMIT_MEMLOCK > > had a single resource counter. After your patch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is > > applied separately to both -- more or less. > > Before the patch the count was doubled since a single page was counted > twice: Once because it was mlocked (marked with PG_mlock) and then again > because it was also pinned (the refcount was increased). Two different > things. Christoph, why are you *STILL* arguing?? You caused a *regression* in a userspace ABI plain and simple, and a security relevant one. Furtermore you modified kernel/events/core.c yet you never even Cc:-ed the parties involved ... All your excuses, obfuscation and attempts to redefine the universe to your liking won't change reality: it worked before, it does not now. Take responsibility for your action for christ's sake and move forward towards a resolution , okay? When can we expect a fix from you for the breakage you caused? Or at least a word that acknowledges that you broke a user ABI carelessly? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org