From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-3.11] cgroup: grab cgroup_mutex in drop_parsed_module_refcounts() Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:51:36 -0400 Message-ID: <51CB3838.10400@oracle.com> References: <51C9D17B.5090208@oracle.com> <20130626010454.GD30407@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130626010521.GE30407@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130626175008.GF4405@mtj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130626175008.GF4405-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Tejun Heo Cc: lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, LKML , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, trinity-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On 06/26/2013 01:50 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:05:21PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: >> This isn't strictly necessary as all subsystems specified in >> @subsys_mask are guaranteed to be pinned; however, it does spuriously >> trigger lockdep warning. Let's grab cgroup_mutex around it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > Applied both patches to cgroup/for-3.11. FWIW, for both patches, Tested-by: Sasha Levin Thanks, Sasha