From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Pearse <peter.pearse@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:11:31 -0000
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Move AT91RM9200DK board support under
	board/atmel
In-Reply-To: <20080316222059.A5665246C5@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <000001c8881f$b09249c0$3a4d010a@Emea.Arm.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wd at denx.de [mailto:wd at denx.de] 
> Sent: 16 March 2008 22:21
> To: Peter Pearse
> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Move AT91RM9200DK board 
> support under board/atmel
> 
> Dear Peter,

-- snip ---

> 
> i. e. something or someone mangled the mail addresses.

-- snip ---
> 
> You see, while the issue looks not really impotant at first 
> glance it might leave a bad (political) aftertaste in cases 
> like here where the attribution of  contributions  from  one  
> company  (Atmel)  get  lost because  of  modifications  done 
> by another company (ARM), especially since both companies 
> have to be seen as competitors.

I believe you misunderstand the relationship between ARM and Atmel here.
However, I agree this is unacceptable, and am investigating how it occurred.

Regards

Peter