public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@atmel.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] FW: [PATCH][ARM] Rationalize ARM compiler options
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:42:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000401c873ea$73c94190$c3031c0a@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 000001c873a2$91d65c60$9a4d010a@Emea.Arm.com

> ---snip---
> 
>> > 
>> > My postion remains that U-Boot is supplied to build with the latest 
>> > ELDK toolchain.
>> > Supporting all possible toolchains (and all possible builds of those
>> > toolchains)
>> > is too much effort.
>> 
>> Since I have already implemented a fix in my private U-boot I 
>> know this to be false (at least for this specific problem).
>> 
> 
> I'm not clear here - are you saying that the arm compiler options,
> in the current U-Boot head, prevent one or more boards building with 
> 
> arm-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 (DENX ELDK 4.1.4.0.0) 
> 

No, I am saying that these options prevent U-Boot to be built
by most things except ELDK, and that removing the "-msoft-float"
should allow U-boot to be built by basically anything.

I also think that there is no reason to force someone to use
architecture specific tuning, but that U-boot should allow
for people to apply this.

> (excluding build systems which treat all warnings as errors)?
> 
> If so, please supply details.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Peter
> 


Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson                ulf at atmel.com
Atmel Nordic AB
Mail:  Box 2033, 174 02 Sundbyberg, Sweden
Visit:  Kavalleriv?gen 24, 174 58 Sundbyberg, Sweden
Phone +46 (8) 441 54 22     Fax +46 (8) 441 54 29
GSM    +46 (706) 22 44 57

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-20 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <011a01c87359$34cbbc70$050514ac@atmel.com>
2008-02-20  9:25 ` [U-Boot-Users] FW: [PATCH][ARM] Rationalize ARM compiler options Peter Pearse
2008-02-20 17:42   ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
2008-02-18  9:20 Peter Pearse
2008-02-18 11:33 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-02-18 12:19   ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-02-18 23:04 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-02-19 12:36   ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-02-20  6:33     ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-02-20  9:55       ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-02-20 17:58         ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-02-20 19:28           ` Haavard Skinnemoen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000401c873ea$73c94190$c3031c0a@atmel.com' \
    --to=ulf@atmel.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox