From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Samuelsson Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:42:42 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] FW: [PATCH][ARM] Rationalize ARM compiler options References: <000001c873a2$91d65c60$9a4d010a@Emea.Arm.com> Message-ID: <000401c873ea$73c94190$c3031c0a@atmel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > ---snip--- > >> > >> > My postion remains that U-Boot is supplied to build with the latest >> > ELDK toolchain. >> > Supporting all possible toolchains (and all possible builds of those >> > toolchains) >> > is too much effort. >> >> Since I have already implemented a fix in my private U-boot I >> know this to be false (at least for this specific problem). >> > > I'm not clear here - are you saying that the arm compiler options, > in the current U-Boot head, prevent one or more boards building with > > arm-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 (DENX ELDK 4.1.4.0.0) > No, I am saying that these options prevent U-Boot to be built by most things except ELDK, and that removing the "-msoft-float" should allow U-boot to be built by basically anything. I also think that there is no reason to force someone to use architecture specific tuning, but that U-boot should allow for people to apply this. > (excluding build systems which treat all warnings as errors)? > > If so, please supply details. > > Regards > > Peter > Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson ulf at atmel.com Atmel Nordic AB Mail: Box 2033, 174 02 Sundbyberg, Sweden Visit: Kavalleriv?gen 24, 174 58 Sundbyberg, Sweden Phone +46 (8) 441 54 22 Fax +46 (8) 441 54 29 GSM +46 (706) 22 44 57